Fission Uranium Corp. et al. v. Dahrouge et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1214 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHarris, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Citation[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1214 (SC),2014 BCSC 1214,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1214
Date10 January 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Mareva and Anton Piller preservation orders in Canada Preliminary Sections
    • June 24, 2017
    ...v Santos, 2014 BCSC First Western Capital v Taylor, [1980] 6 WWR 69, 20 BCLR 149, 1980 Can LI I 604 (SC) Fission Uranium v Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 92 7° 20® Fonagy v Oasis Trucking, 2006 SKQB 233 58» 65, 215< 214 Formosa Plastic v Ashok Chauhan (8 October 1998) (High Court of Delhi) 5i Fow......
  • Preservation of Property Rules
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Mareva and Anton Piller preservation orders in Canada Preservation of Property Rules
    • June 24, 2017
    ...Osooli-Talesh v Emami, 2003 BCSC 1924 at paras 49-51 McKnight v Hutchison, 2011 BCSC 36 at paras 145-46 Fission Uranium v Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 at para 163 The test for a preservation order differs from the more onerous test for a Mareva order in that the rule 10-1 test does not require ......
  • 2024 BCSC 472,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...the court to consider the petitioner's delay in bringing this injunction application at this stage. In Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 Madam Justice Harris found the plaintiff's delay in asserting the claim material to the irreparable harm analysis. She had also been asked......
  • Trainer v. Tractorhill Sales Ltd., 2018 BCSC 2043
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 21, 2018
    ...down by the court in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311. See also Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 at paras. 164-166. [37] Rule 10-1(1) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules reads as follows: Property that is the subject matter of a proceeding (......
  • Get Started for Free
8 cases
  • 2024 BCSC 472,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2024
    ...the court to consider the petitioner's delay in bringing this injunction application at this stage. In Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 Madam Justice Harris found the plaintiff's delay in asserting the claim material to the irreparable harm analysis. She had also been asked......
  • Trainer v. Tractorhill Sales Ltd., 2018 BCSC 2043
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 21, 2018
    ...down by the court in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311. See also Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 at paras. 164-166. [37] Rule 10-1(1) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules reads as follows: Property that is the subject matter of a proceeding (......
  • Petersen v Hawley,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 21, 2024
    ...the court to consider the petitioner's delay in bringing this injunction application at this stage. In Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 Madam Justice Harris found the plaintiff's delay in asserting the claim material to the irreparable harm analysis. She had also been asked......
  • Avidworx Productions Inc. v. Culbertson et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 135 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 29, 2015
    ...[89] The law is well settled regarding the test for an interlocutory injunction. Harris J. in Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 stated the test in this fashion: [164] The three-part test for an interlocutory injunction was articulated in RJR-MacDonald . In this province, the......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Mareva and Anton Piller preservation orders in Canada Preliminary Sections
    • June 24, 2017
    ...v Santos, 2014 BCSC First Western Capital v Taylor, [1980] 6 WWR 69, 20 BCLR 149, 1980 Can LI I 604 (SC) Fission Uranium v Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 92 7° 20® Fonagy v Oasis Trucking, 2006 SKQB 233 58» 65, 215< 214 Formosa Plastic v Ashok Chauhan (8 October 1998) (High Court of Delhi) 5i Fow......
  • Preservation of Property Rules
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Mareva and Anton Piller preservation orders in Canada Preservation of Property Rules
    • June 24, 2017
    ...Osooli-Talesh v Emami, 2003 BCSC 1924 at paras 49-51 McKnight v Hutchison, 2011 BCSC 36 at paras 145-46 Fission Uranium v Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 at para 163 The test for a preservation order differs from the more onerous test for a Mareva order in that the rule 10-1 test does not require ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT