Fission Uranium Corp. et al. v. Dahrouge et al.

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeHarris, J.
Citation[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1214 (SC),2014 BCSC 1214,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1214
Date10 January 2014
Subject MatterEQUITY,INJUNCTIONS,PRACTICE

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Mareva and Anton Piller preservation orders in Canada Preliminary Sections
    • June 24, 2017
    ...v Santos, 2014 BCSC First Western Capital v Taylor, [1980] 6 WWR 69, 20 BCLR 149, 1980 Can LI I 604 (SC) Fission Uranium v Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 92 7° 20® Fonagy v Oasis Trucking, 2006 SKQB 233 58» 65, 215< 214 Formosa Plastic v Ashok Chauhan (8 October 1998) (High Court of Delhi) 5i Fow......
  • Preservation of Property Rules
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Mareva and Anton Piller preservation orders in Canada Preservation of Property Rules
    • June 24, 2017
    ...Osooli-Talesh v Emami, 2003 BCSC 1924 at paras 49-51 McKnight v Hutchison, 2011 BCSC 36 at paras 145-46 Fission Uranium v Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 at para 163 The test for a preservation order differs from the more onerous test for a Mareva order in that the rule 10-1 test does not require ......
  • Petersen v Hawley
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 21, 2024
    ...the court to consider the petitioner's delay in bringing this injunction application at this stage. In Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 Madam Justice Harris found the plaintiff's delay in asserting the claim material to the irreparable harm analysis. She had also been asked......
  • Trainer v. Tractorhill Sales Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 21, 2018
    ...down by the court in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311. See also Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 at paras. 164-166. [37] Rule 10-1(1) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules reads as follows: Property that is the subject matter of a proceeding (......
  • Get Started for Free
8 cases
  • Petersen v Hawley
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 21, 2024
    ...the court to consider the petitioner's delay in bringing this injunction application at this stage. In Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 Madam Justice Harris found the plaintiff's delay in asserting the claim material to the irreparable harm analysis. She had also been asked......
  • Trainer v. Tractorhill Sales Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 21, 2018
    ...down by the court in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311. See also Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 at paras. 164-166. [37] Rule 10-1(1) of the Supreme Court Civil Rules reads as follows: Property that is the subject matter of a proceeding (......
  • Axion Ventures Inc. v Bonner
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 25, 2026
    ...its position that only the Trustee has standing to pursue the claim in the Debt Action, Axion cited Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 at para. 135, in support of its assertion that having assigned their rights to the Loans to NextPlay, the Bonner Parties lack standing to ass......
  • Pemberton Music Festival Limited Partnership (Re)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 29, 2017
    ...[1995] 20 C.B.R. (N.S.) 229 (Ont. S.C., In Bankruptcy) at para. 17, as are constructive trust claims: Fission Uranium Corp. v. Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 at para. 122.[72] I conclude that if the ticket sale proceeds are held by the Trustee on a constructive trust, Ticketfly Canada would be en......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Mareva and Anton Piller preservation orders in Canada Preliminary Sections
    • June 24, 2017
    ...v Santos, 2014 BCSC First Western Capital v Taylor, [1980] 6 WWR 69, 20 BCLR 149, 1980 Can LI I 604 (SC) Fission Uranium v Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 92 7° 20® Fonagy v Oasis Trucking, 2006 SKQB 233 58» 65, 215< 214 Formosa Plastic v Ashok Chauhan (8 October 1998) (High Court of Delhi) 5i Fow......
  • Preservation of Property Rules
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Mareva and Anton Piller preservation orders in Canada Preservation of Property Rules
    • June 24, 2017
    ...Osooli-Talesh v Emami, 2003 BCSC 1924 at paras 49-51 McKnight v Hutchison, 2011 BCSC 36 at paras 145-46 Fission Uranium v Dahrouge, 2014 BCSC 1214 at para 163 The test for a preservation order differs from the more onerous test for a Mareva order in that the rule 10-1 test does not require ......