Flint Field Services v. Workers' Compensation Board Appeals Commission (Alta.), [2014] A.R. Uned. 426 (QB)

JudgeSchutz, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Subject MatterADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PRACTICE,COURTS
Date05 February 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Miller v. Workers' Compensation Board Appeals Commission (Alta.), 2016 ABQB 79
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Febrero 2016
    ...Belkadi at para 28. [45] Similarly, in Flint Field Services v Alberta (Appeals Commission for Alberta Workers' Compensation) , 2014 ABQB 382 at para 32, 242 ACWS (3d) 757, Schutz J, as she then was, said the following: I am reviewing the Reconsideration Panel's Decision, only, not......
  • Thurm v Alberta Labour Relations Board, 2018 ABQB 300
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Abril 2018
    ...to decide the issue on the merits. Finally, in Flint Field Services v Alberta (Appeals Commission for Alberta Worker’ Compensation), 2014 ABQB 382 the Court stated that it was not its role to decide the matters on judicial review afresh. As a result, evidence that was not before the Tribuna......
2 cases
  • Miller v. Workers' Compensation Board Appeals Commission (Alta.), 2016 ABQB 79
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 8 Febrero 2016
    ...Belkadi at para 28. [45] Similarly, in Flint Field Services v Alberta (Appeals Commission for Alberta Workers' Compensation) , 2014 ABQB 382 at para 32, 242 ACWS (3d) 757, Schutz J, as she then was, said the following: I am reviewing the Reconsideration Panel's Decision, only, not......
  • Thurm v Alberta Labour Relations Board, 2018 ABQB 300
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 17 Abril 2018
    ...to decide the issue on the merits. Finally, in Flint Field Services v Alberta (Appeals Commission for Alberta Worker’ Compensation), 2014 ABQB 382 the Court stated that it was not its role to decide the matters on judicial review afresh. As a result, evidence that was not before the Tribuna......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT