Flore v. Jongkind, 2018 BCSC 721

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Adair
Date04 May 2018
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberM136815
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 practice notes
  • Murphy v. Tait, 2021 BCSC 292
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 24, 2021
    ...his position he relies on: a)    Cheema v. Khan, 2017 BCSC 974 [Cheema] ($75,000); b)    Flore v. Jongkind, 2018 BCSC 721 c)    Karst v. Foster, 2019 BCSC 1043 ($90,000); and d)    Morgan v. Scott, 2012 BCSC 1237 ($100,000). [76]&#......
  • Fatin v. Watson,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 1, 2020
    ...authorities: Buckle v. Raworth, 2015 BCSC 989, Wendt v. Pantages, 2017 BCSC 2428, Petrovic v. Stetsko, 2017 BCSC 741, Flore v. Jongkind, 2018 BCSC 721, Randall v. Boettger, 2020 BCSC [52] Those cases likewise offer many parallels to this one, but also important differences. The plaintiffs i......
  • Repin v. Aam Ventures Ltd, 2020 BCSC 227
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 21, 2020
    ...sense should inform claims for costs of future care, however such costs may be recommended by experts in the field”: Flore v. Bampton, 2018 BCSC 721 at para. 211, citing Penner v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2011 BCCA 135 at para. 13. No award is appropriate for costs that a ......
  • Schaffner v. Greenbank,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 17, 2021
    ...BCSC 157 ($95,000); Fedosenko v. Zahirfar, 2018 BCSC 1297 ($80,000 before reduction for pre-existing condition); and Flore v. Jongkind, 2018 BCSC 721 ($90,000). [48]        I have considered the cases cited by both counsel. Each case turns on its own speci......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Murphy v. Tait, 2021 BCSC 292
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 24, 2021
    ...his position he relies on: a)    Cheema v. Khan, 2017 BCSC 974 [Cheema] ($75,000); b)    Flore v. Jongkind, 2018 BCSC 721 c)    Karst v. Foster, 2019 BCSC 1043 ($90,000); and d)    Morgan v. Scott, 2012 BCSC 1237 ($100,000). [76]&#......
  • Fatin v. Watson,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 1, 2020
    ...authorities: Buckle v. Raworth, 2015 BCSC 989, Wendt v. Pantages, 2017 BCSC 2428, Petrovic v. Stetsko, 2017 BCSC 741, Flore v. Jongkind, 2018 BCSC 721, Randall v. Boettger, 2020 BCSC [52] Those cases likewise offer many parallels to this one, but also important differences. The plaintiffs i......
  • Repin v. Aam Ventures Ltd, 2020 BCSC 227
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 21, 2020
    ...sense should inform claims for costs of future care, however such costs may be recommended by experts in the field”: Flore v. Bampton, 2018 BCSC 721 at para. 211, citing Penner v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2011 BCCA 135 at para. 13. No award is appropriate for costs that a ......
  • Schaffner v. Greenbank,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 17, 2021
    ...BCSC 157 ($95,000); Fedosenko v. Zahirfar, 2018 BCSC 1297 ($80,000 before reduction for pre-existing condition); and Flore v. Jongkind, 2018 BCSC 721 ($90,000). [48]        I have considered the cases cited by both counsel. Each case turns on its own speci......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT