Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | W.S. Schlosser |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 266 |
| Docket Number | 0903 13194 |
| Date | 21 April 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Waquan v. Canada (Attorney General)
...delay ought not to be held against a plaintiff: Duraguard Fence at para 4; MT Investments at para 11; Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266 at paras [121] A pending application does not act as a stay but slows activity in a lawsuit, so must be considered: M......
-
Woodbridge Homes Inc v Randle
...categories, the most common being defence or third-party delay, defence acquiescence, or health issues: Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266 at para 20 [Fode]. Applications Judge Schlosser noted the following about excusable …For the most part, an acceptable excuse for delay is c......
-
Gammage v Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd.
...the delay”: Housser v Savin Canada Inc, 2005 CanLII 35779, 77 OR (3d) 251 at para 14 (SCJ). [104] In Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266, Master Schlosser, Q.C. noted the following about excusable delay, at paras If we examine the decided cases, excusable delay falls into severa......
-
Vasiljevic v Kotur
...of significant prejudice that would justify dismissing the action. The comments of Schlosser A.J. in Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266, at paras 27 and 28, seem apt for this case as This is not a case of having untoward, unproven allegations hanging over your head and a delay ......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Waquan v. Canada (Attorney General)
...delay ought not to be held against a plaintiff: Duraguard Fence at para 4; MT Investments at para 11; Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266 at paras [121] A pending application does not act as a stay but slows activity in a lawsuit, so must be considered: M......
-
Woodbridge Homes Inc v Randle
...categories, the most common being defence or third-party delay, defence acquiescence, or health issues: Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266 at para 20 [Fode]. Applications Judge Schlosser noted the following about excusable …For the most part, an acceptable excuse for delay is c......
-
Gammage v Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd.
...the delay”: Housser v Savin Canada Inc, 2005 CanLII 35779, 77 OR (3d) 251 at para 14 (SCJ). [104] In Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266, Master Schlosser, Q.C. noted the following about excusable delay, at paras If we examine the decided cases, excusable delay falls into severa......
-
Vasiljevic v Kotur
...of significant prejudice that would justify dismissing the action. The comments of Schlosser A.J. in Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266, at paras 27 and 28, seem apt for this case as This is not a case of having untoward, unproven allegations hanging over your head and a delay ......
Get Started for Free
