FortisAlberta Inc. v. Alberta Utilities Commission et al., 2015 ABCA 295

JudgePaperny, Watson and Rowbotham, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Subject MatterSTATUTES,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PUBLIC UTILITIES
Citation2015 ABCA 295,[2015] A.R. Uned. 258,[2015] A.R. Uned. 258 (CA)
Date18 September 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
31 practice notes
  • Gitxaala Nation et al. v. Canada et al., (2016) 485 N.R. 258 (FCA)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • June 23, 2016
    ...effects. A good example is the decision of the Alberta Utilities Commission in FortisAlberta Inc v. Alberta (Utilities Commission) , 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1. In words apposite to this case, the Alberta Court of Appeal upheld the Commission's decision, giving it a very broad margin......
  • Re:Sound v. Canadian Association of Broadcasters, 2017 FCA 138
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • June 28, 2017
    ...the [administrative decision-maker] empowered and mandated to make that selection”: FortisAlberta Inc v. Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1 at paras. 171-172; to similar effect, see Rotherham v. Metropolitan Borough Council v. Secretary of State for Business I......
  • WCSB Power Alberta Limited Partnership v Alberta Utilities Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 12, 2022
    ...instance, says Decision 26090 is supportable under ss 16 and 17 of the AUCA as cited in FortisAlberta v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295 at paras 171-172, [2015] AJ No 1005 171  The legislature has entrusted the Commission with a policy-laden role, which includes a strong ......
  • Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) v. Canada, 2018 FCA 58
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • March 22, 2018
    ...the [administrative decision-maker] empowered and mandated to make that selection”: FortisAlberta Inc. v. Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1 at paras. 171-172; to similar effect, see Rotherham v. Metropolitan Borough Council v. Secretary of State for Business ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
26 cases
  • Gitxaala Nation et al. v. Canada et al., (2016) 485 N.R. 258 (FCA)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • June 23, 2016
    ...effects. A good example is the decision of the Alberta Utilities Commission in FortisAlberta Inc v. Alberta (Utilities Commission) , 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1. In words apposite to this case, the Alberta Court of Appeal upheld the Commission's decision, giving it a very broad margin......
  • Re:Sound v. Canadian Association of Broadcasters, 2017 FCA 138
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • June 28, 2017
    ...the [administrative decision-maker] empowered and mandated to make that selection”: FortisAlberta Inc v. Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1 at paras. 171-172; to similar effect, see Rotherham v. Metropolitan Borough Council v. Secretary of State for Business I......
  • WCSB Power Alberta Limited Partnership v Alberta Utilities Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • May 12, 2022
    ...instance, says Decision 26090 is supportable under ss 16 and 17 of the AUCA as cited in FortisAlberta v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295 at paras 171-172, [2015] AJ No 1005 171  The legislature has entrusted the Commission with a policy-laden role, which includes a strong ......
  • Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) v. Canada, 2018 FCA 58
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • March 22, 2018
    ...the [administrative decision-maker] empowered and mandated to make that selection”: FortisAlberta Inc. v. Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1 at paras. 171-172; to similar effect, see Rotherham v. Metropolitan Borough Council v. Secretary of State for Business ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
  • Supreme Court Determines Regulator Discretion Is Wide And The Prudency Test Is Ongoing
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 28, 2015
    ...On September 18, 2015, the Alberta Court of Appeal handed down its decision in FortisAlberta Inc. v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295. Nearly all Alberta electric and gas utilities participated to argue strongly that they should be able to continue to recover capital costs of fa......
  • Top Ten Energy Industry Regulatory Decisions And Developments In 2019
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 3, 2020
    ...Transmission General Tariff Application (October 2, 2019) at paras. 89-91. 18 FortisAlberta Inc v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295 at para. 19 Decision 22742-D02-2019, ATCO Electric Ltd., 2018-2019 Transmission General Tariff Application (October 2, 2019) at paras. 67-85. 20 De......
  • New Legislation To Impact Alberta's Electricity Future
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 20, 2018
    ...[PDF] (25 April 2018). 19 Stores Block, para 78. 20 Stores Block, para 87. 21 See FortisAlberta Inc v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295 [FortisAlberta] at paras 22 Ibid. 23 FortisAlberta, para 62. 24 FortisAlberta, paras 160-161. 25 AUC Decision 3100-D01-2015, EPCOR Distribution......
  • The Fort McMurray Wildfire Cases: Life After Stores Block
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 7, 2020
    ...(pdf): . 13. Ibid at 1-2. 14. UAD Decision, supra note 9. 15. Ibid at para 102. 16. Fortis Alberta Inc. v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295, leave appeal to SCC refused, 36728 (21 April 2016). 17. UAD Decision, supra note 9 at paras 334-35. 18. Ibid at para 336. 19. See UAD Deci......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT