FortisAlberta Inc. v. Alberta Utilities Commission et al., 2015 ABCA 295
Judge | Paperny, Watson and Rowbotham, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
Subject Matter | STATUTES,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PUBLIC UTILITIES |
Citation | 2015 ABCA 295,[2015] A.R. Uned. 258,[2015] A.R. Uned. 258 (CA) |
Date | 18 September 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 practice notes
-
Gitxaala Nation et al. v. Canada et al., (2016) 485 N.R. 258 (FCA)
...effects. A good example is the decision of the Alberta Utilities Commission in FortisAlberta Inc v. Alberta (Utilities Commission) , 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1. In words apposite to this case, the Alberta Court of Appeal upheld the Commission's decision, giving it a very broad margin......
-
Re:Sound v. Canadian Association of Broadcasters, 2017 FCA 138
...the [administrative decision-maker] empowered and mandated to make that selection”: FortisAlberta Inc v. Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1 at paras. 171-172; to similar effect, see Rotherham v. Metropolitan Borough Council v. Secretary of State for Business I......
-
WCSB Power Alberta Limited Partnership v Alberta Utilities Commission,
...instance, says Decision 26090 is supportable under ss 16 and 17 of the AUCA as cited in FortisAlberta v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295 at paras 171-172, [2015] AJ No 1005 171 The legislature has entrusted the Commission with a policy-laden role, which includes a strong ......
-
Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) v. Canada, 2018 FCA 58
...the [administrative decision-maker] empowered and mandated to make that selection”: FortisAlberta Inc. v. Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1 at paras. 171-172; to similar effect, see Rotherham v. Metropolitan Borough Council v. Secretary of State for Business ......
Request a trial to view additional results
26 cases
-
Gitxaala Nation et al. v. Canada et al., (2016) 485 N.R. 258 (FCA)
...effects. A good example is the decision of the Alberta Utilities Commission in FortisAlberta Inc v. Alberta (Utilities Commission) , 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1. In words apposite to this case, the Alberta Court of Appeal upheld the Commission's decision, giving it a very broad margin......
-
Re:Sound v. Canadian Association of Broadcasters, 2017 FCA 138
...the [administrative decision-maker] empowered and mandated to make that selection”: FortisAlberta Inc v. Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1 at paras. 171-172; to similar effect, see Rotherham v. Metropolitan Borough Council v. Secretary of State for Business I......
-
WCSB Power Alberta Limited Partnership v Alberta Utilities Commission,
...instance, says Decision 26090 is supportable under ss 16 and 17 of the AUCA as cited in FortisAlberta v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295 at paras 171-172, [2015] AJ No 1005 171 The legislature has entrusted the Commission with a policy-laden role, which includes a strong ......
-
Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) v. Canada, 2018 FCA 58
...the [administrative decision-maker] empowered and mandated to make that selection”: FortisAlberta Inc. v. Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295, 389 D.L.R. (4th) 1 at paras. 171-172; to similar effect, see Rotherham v. Metropolitan Borough Council v. Secretary of State for Business ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
-
Supreme Court Determines Regulator Discretion Is Wide And The Prudency Test Is Ongoing
...On September 18, 2015, the Alberta Court of Appeal handed down its decision in FortisAlberta Inc. v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295. Nearly all Alberta electric and gas utilities participated to argue strongly that they should be able to continue to recover capital costs of fa......
-
Top Ten Energy Industry Regulatory Decisions And Developments In 2019
...Transmission General Tariff Application (October 2, 2019) at paras. 89-91. 18 FortisAlberta Inc v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295 at para. 19 Decision 22742-D02-2019, ATCO Electric Ltd., 2018-2019 Transmission General Tariff Application (October 2, 2019) at paras. 67-85. 20 De......
-
New Legislation To Impact Alberta's Electricity Future
...[PDF] (25 April 2018). 19 Stores Block, para 78. 20 Stores Block, para 87. 21 See FortisAlberta Inc v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295 [FortisAlberta] at paras 22 Ibid. 23 FortisAlberta, para 62. 24 FortisAlberta, paras 160-161. 25 AUC Decision 3100-D01-2015, EPCOR Distribution......
-
The Fort McMurray Wildfire Cases: Life After Stores Block
...(pdf): . 13. Ibid at 1-2. 14. UAD Decision, supra note 9. 15. Ibid at para 102. 16. Fortis Alberta Inc. v Alberta (Utilities Commission), 2015 ABCA 295, leave appeal to SCC refused, 36728 (21 April 2016). 17. UAD Decision, supra note 9 at paras 334-35. 18. Ibid at para 336. 19. See UAD Deci......
Request a trial to view additional results