Frame v. Rai Estate, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1876 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Jenkins, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | GIFTS,FAMILY LAW,TRUSTS,RESTITUTION |
| Citation | [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1876 (SC),2012 BCSC 1876,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1876 |
| Date | 12 December 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Hyczkewycz v. Hupe, 2017 MBQB 209
...trusts and our land titles regime can co-exist as recognized by the courts of Alberta and British Columbia. She referred to Frame v. Rai, 2012 BCSC 1876, [2012] B.C.J. No. 2615 (QL) at paras. 100-30, and Bezuko v. Supruniuk, 2007 ABQB 204, 41 R.F.L. (6th) 93 at paras. 26-33. In Bezuko, the ......
-
Hyczkewycz v. Hupe, (2015) 320 Man.R.(2d) 126 (QB)
...Fels v. Knowles (1907), 26 N.Z.L.R. 604 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17]. Frame v. Rai Estate, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1876; 83 E.T.R.(3d) 245; 2012 BCSC 1876, refd to. [para. 20]. Dhaliwal v. Olleck, [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1524; 2010 BCSC 1524, refd to. [para. 21]. Bezuko v. Supruniuk (2007), 428 ......
-
McInerney v. Laass et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1708
...Agreement and the parties' actions make it clear that Ms. Laass did not intend to benefit the petitioner. [64] In Frame v. Rai , 2012 BCSC 1876, Jenkins J. reviewed the authorities with respect to rebutting the statutory presumption in s. 23(2) of the Land Title Act, and determined that it ......
-
Frame v. Rai Estate, 2013 BCSC 686
...the plaintiff and invited submissions from the parties as to the appropriate scale of costs. Those Reasons for Judgment can be found at 2012 BCSC 1876. The plaintiff was successful at trial and was found to be entitled to a one-half interest in a home located in Surrey, BC (the "Property").......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Hyczkewycz v. Hupe, 2017 MBQB 209
...trusts and our land titles regime can co-exist as recognized by the courts of Alberta and British Columbia. She referred to Frame v. Rai, 2012 BCSC 1876, [2012] B.C.J. No. 2615 (QL) at paras. 100-30, and Bezuko v. Supruniuk, 2007 ABQB 204, 41 R.F.L. (6th) 93 at paras. 26-33. In Bezuko, the ......
-
Hyczkewycz v. Hupe, (2015) 320 Man.R.(2d) 126 (QB)
...Fels v. Knowles (1907), 26 N.Z.L.R. 604 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17]. Frame v. Rai Estate, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1876; 83 E.T.R.(3d) 245; 2012 BCSC 1876, refd to. [para. 20]. Dhaliwal v. Olleck, [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1524; 2010 BCSC 1524, refd to. [para. 21]. Bezuko v. Supruniuk (2007), 428 ......
-
McInerney v. Laass et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1708
...Agreement and the parties' actions make it clear that Ms. Laass did not intend to benefit the petitioner. [64] In Frame v. Rai , 2012 BCSC 1876, Jenkins J. reviewed the authorities with respect to rebutting the statutory presumption in s. 23(2) of the Land Title Act, and determined that it ......
-
Frame v. Rai Estate, 2013 BCSC 686
...the plaintiff and invited submissions from the parties as to the appropriate scale of costs. Those Reasons for Judgment can be found at 2012 BCSC 1876. The plaintiff was successful at trial and was found to be entitled to a one-half interest in a home located in Surrey, BC (the "Property").......
Request a trial to view additional results