Frame v. Riddle, 2018 FCA 204
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FCA 204 |
| Date | 09 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Are class actions progressive? An enquiry into the nature and function of modern class actions
...adoptees and Indigenous communities to this day.” 98 Riddle v Canada, 2018 FC 905, motion for leave to appeal dismissed, Frame v Riddle, 2018 FCA 204. 99 LCO Report at 15. 146 The Canadian Cl ass Action R eview | Volume 17 No 2 public company (and other named respondents) 100 on behalf of......
-
Waldron v. Canada, 2024 FCA 2
...and adequately represent the class in the appeal, and that the appeal itself is in the best interests of the class: Frame v. Riddle, 2018 FCA 204 at paras. 24-25; Ottawa v. McLean at paras. 11, 13. Even if Ms. Waldron had sought leave under rule 334.31(2), therefore, it would not have avail......
-
IRENE BRECKON ET AL. v CERMAQ CANADA LTD. ET AL., 2024 FC 225
...that requires it to be mindful of the best interests of class members as a whole (Difederico at para 29, citing Frame v Riddle, 2018 FCA 204 at para 24 and Ottawa v McLean, 2019 FCA 309 at para 13). This includes the best interests of prospective class members, whose interests may not be en......
-
Hébert v. Wenham, 2020 FCA 186
...that must be determined by three judges of this Court: see section 16 of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7; Frame v. Riddle, 2018 FCA 204 at para. 25. [7] The test is set out in Frame; see also Ottawa v. McLean, 2019 FCA 309. The class member “must show that he or she will fairly ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Waldron v. Canada, 2024 FCA 2
...and adequately represent the class in the appeal, and that the appeal itself is in the best interests of the class: Frame v. Riddle, 2018 FCA 204 at paras. 24-25; Ottawa v. McLean at paras. 11, 13. Even if Ms. Waldron had sought leave under rule 334.31(2), therefore, it would not have avail......
-
Hébert v. Wenham, 2020 FCA 186
...that must be determined by three judges of this Court: see section 16 of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7; Frame v. Riddle, 2018 FCA 204 at para. 25. [7] The test is set out in Frame; see also Ottawa v. McLean, 2019 FCA 309. The class member “must show that he or she will fairly ......
-
Ottawa v. McLean, 2019 FCA 309
...at paragraph 3). [11] I would like to say a word about the nature of this motion. As in the decision of this Court in Frame v. Riddle, 2018 FCA 204 [Frame], this is an application to grant a Class Member leave to exercise the right of appeal of the representative plaintiff from an approval ......
-
Brown v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ONSC 5456
...P. Belobaba Date: November 15, 2018 [1] Riddle et al v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 FC 900 (September 10, 2018). [2] Frame v. Riddle, 2018 FCA 204 (November 9, [3] Brown v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ONSC 3429. [4] Ibid. at para. 90. [5] Ibid. at para. 75. [6] Ibid. at paras. 32-33. [7......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Are class actions progressive? An enquiry into the nature and function of modern class actions
...adoptees and Indigenous communities to this day.” 98 Riddle v Canada, 2018 FC 905, motion for leave to appeal dismissed, Frame v Riddle, 2018 FCA 204. 99 LCO Report at 15. 146 The Canadian Cl ass Action R eview | Volume 17 No 2 public company (and other named respondents) 100 on behalf of......