Freshslice Properties Ltd. v. R.T.M. Holdings Ltd., 2013 BCSC 135

JudgeVerhoeven, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 31, 2013
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2013 BCSC 135;[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 135;[2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 135 (SC)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • Mee Hoi Bros. Company Ltd. v. Borving Investments (Canada) Ltd., 2017 BCSC 1910
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 25, 2017
    ...for contract costs as that would constitute double recovery. That was the holding in Freshslice Properties Ltd. v. R.T.M. Holdings Ltd., 2013 BCSC 135. At para. 129, Mr. Justice Verhoeven In my view the landlord has been substantially successful in the litigation and is therefore ......
  • 0824606 B.C. Ltd. v. Plain Jane Boutique Ltd., 2018 BCSC 1887
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 31, 2018
    ...the sewer pipe and where the problems resulted in only minimal consequences to operations: Freshslice Properties Ltd. v. R.T.M. Holdings, 2013 BCSC 135. [104] Some cases have specifically dealt with the issue of scaffolding impacting use and enjoyment. In Goldmile Properties Ltd. v. Lechour......
  • Siddoo v. OJJJ Enterprises Ltd., 2020 BCSC 297
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 4, 2020
    ...the sewer pipe and where the problems resulted in only minimal consequences to operations: Freshslice Properties Ltd. v. R.T.M. Holdings, 2013 BCSC 135. [242]    The various cases referred to in Plain Jane Boutique demonstrate that whether there has been breach of the covenan......
  • HPWC 9707 110 Street Limited Partnership v Funds Administrative Service Inc, 2019 ABQB 167
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 8, 2019
    ...under him with the enjoyment of the premises for all usual purposes” (para 9; see also Freshslice Properties Ltd v RTM Holdings Ltd, 2013 BCSC 135 at para 92; LaBuick at paras 53 & 54). The covenant of quiet enjoyment is only breached if the breaching actions are “by the landlord or per......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • Mee Hoi Bros. Company Ltd. v. Borving Investments (Canada) Ltd., 2017 BCSC 1910
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 25, 2017
    ...for contract costs as that would constitute double recovery. That was the holding in Freshslice Properties Ltd. v. R.T.M. Holdings Ltd., 2013 BCSC 135. At para. 129, Mr. Justice Verhoeven In my view the landlord has been substantially successful in the litigation and is therefore ......
  • 0824606 B.C. Ltd. v. Plain Jane Boutique Ltd., 2018 BCSC 1887
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 31, 2018
    ...the sewer pipe and where the problems resulted in only minimal consequences to operations: Freshslice Properties Ltd. v. R.T.M. Holdings, 2013 BCSC 135. [104] Some cases have specifically dealt with the issue of scaffolding impacting use and enjoyment. In Goldmile Properties Ltd. v. Lechour......
  • Siddoo v. OJJJ Enterprises Ltd., 2020 BCSC 297
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 4, 2020
    ...the sewer pipe and where the problems resulted in only minimal consequences to operations: Freshslice Properties Ltd. v. R.T.M. Holdings, 2013 BCSC 135. [242]    The various cases referred to in Plain Jane Boutique demonstrate that whether there has been breach of the covenan......
  • HPWC 9707 110 Street Limited Partnership v Funds Administrative Service Inc, 2019 ABQB 167
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 8, 2019
    ...under him with the enjoyment of the premises for all usual purposes” (para 9; see also Freshslice Properties Ltd v RTM Holdings Ltd, 2013 BCSC 135 at para 92; LaBuick at paras 53 & 54). The covenant of quiet enjoyment is only breached if the breaching actions are “by the landlord or per......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT