Fric v. Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Subject MatterPRACTICE
Citation2012 BCSC 614,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 614 (SCM),[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 614
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date27 April 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • Of a Social Media Evidence Checklist and Prepping for Lawmageddon
    • Canada
    • Slaw Canada’s Online Legal Magazine
    • May 11, 2015
    ...which deals with the distinction of “real” versus “documentary” electronic evidence under the Canada Evidence Act, or Fric v. Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614, which is a nice summation of some principles for BC, are not mentioned in recent The folks I talk to (bench and bar) seem to shore up my the......
  • Travis v. Bittner,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 22, 2022
    ...social media content has been addressed in a number of decisions under the Supreme Court Civil Rules, including Fric v. Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614; Cui v. Metcalfe, 2015 BCSC 1195; and Dosanjh v. Leblanc, 2011 BCSC 1660.  Generally speaking, the considerations for the court on this type o......
  • Teunissen v. Hulstra, 2017 BCSC 2365
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 15, 2017
    ...     While the defendant has referred to a number of cases, including Cikojevic v. Timm, 2010 BCSC 800, Fric v. Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614, and Tambosso v. Holmes, 2015 BCSC 359, in which Facebook documents were entered into evidence, some in large numbers, these cases are not h......
  • When 'Private' Isn't Private: Discovery In The Age Of Facebook
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 10, 2012
    ...In the end, the weight such information has at trial may be as fleeting as a Facebook status update. Footnotes 1 Fric v Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614. 2 Guthrie v Narayan, 2012 BCSC The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Teunissen v. Hulstra, 2017 BCSC 2365
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 15, 2017
    ...     While the defendant has referred to a number of cases, including Cikojevic v. Timm, 2010 BCSC 800, Fric v. Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614, and Tambosso v. Holmes, 2015 BCSC 359, in which Facebook documents were entered into evidence, some in large numbers, these cases are not h......
  • Travis v. Bittner,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 22, 2022
    ...social media content has been addressed in a number of decisions under the Supreme Court Civil Rules, including Fric v. Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614; Cui v. Metcalfe, 2015 BCSC 1195; and Dosanjh v. Leblanc, 2011 BCSC 1660.  Generally speaking, the considerations for the court on this type o......
  • Cui v. Metcalfe, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1195 (SCM)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 27, 2015
    ...may contradict the plaintiff's other evidence, they are not necessarily disclosable in the first instance. [15] In Fric v. Gershman , 2012 BCSC 614, Master Bouck dealt with a similar application in an action arising from a motor vehicle accident. She helpfully reviewed the earlier cases con......
1 firm's commentaries
  • When 'Private' Isn't Private: Discovery In The Age Of Facebook
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 10, 2012
    ...In the end, the weight such information has at trial may be as fleeting as a Facebook status update. Footnotes 1 Fric v Gershman, 2012 BCSC 614. 2 Guthrie v Narayan, 2012 BCSC The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT