Friesen v. Moo, 2018 BCSC 1866

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeArmstrong
Citation2018 BCSC 1866
Date29 October 2018
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberM150419, M153359
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • Jones v. McMann, 2020 BCSC 1645
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 4, 2020
    ...Mr. Jones’ counsel relies on a number of cases to support his non-pecuniary damages claim. Only one of those, Friesen v. Moo, 2018 BCSC 1866, involved a plaintiff in custody. In Friesen, the plaintiff had injuries somewhat similar to the plaintiff in this case and the Court awar......
1 cases
  • Jones v. McMann, 2020 BCSC 1645
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • November 4, 2020
    ...Mr. Jones’ counsel relies on a number of cases to support his non-pecuniary damages claim. Only one of those, Friesen v. Moo, 2018 BCSC 1866, involved a plaintiff in custody. In Friesen, the plaintiff had injuries somewhat similar to the plaintiff in this case and the Court awar......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT