Froc v. Gismondi et al., [2005] B.C.T.C. Uned. 638 (SC)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeLoo, J.
Citation[2005] B.C.T.C. Uned. 638 (SC),[2005] B.C.T.C. Uned. 638,2005 BCSC 1570
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterDAMAGES,TORTS,DAMAGE AWARDS
Date07 November 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • Filimek v. Braaten et al., 2009 BCSC 866
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 29 Junio 2009
    ...better and do all the things that he did prior to the accident. He is highly motivated. [48] The plaintiff relied on Froc v. Gismondi , 2005 BCSC 1570, Andres v. Leslie & Swackhamer , 2005 BCSC 1096 and Kerr v. Macklin , 2004 BCSC 318 for determining the non-pecuniary damage award. The ......
1 cases
  • Filimek v. Braaten et al., 2009 BCSC 866
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 29 Junio 2009
    ...better and do all the things that he did prior to the accident. He is highly motivated. [48] The plaintiff relied on Froc v. Gismondi , 2005 BCSC 1570, Andres v. Leslie & Swackhamer , 2005 BCSC 1096 and Kerr v. Macklin , 2004 BCSC 318 for determining the non-pecuniary damage award. The ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT