Fundamental Securities Law Concepts

AuthorChristopher C. Nicholls, Jeffrey G. Macintosh
Pages23-62
CHAPTER
2
FUNDAMENTAL
SECURITIES
LAW
CONCEPTS
A.
INTRODUCTION
In
this chapter,
we
introduce some essential securities
law
terms
and
concepts. These include
the
three perhaps most foundational
defini-
tions
in
Canadian securities law:
security,
trade,
and
distribution.
B.
WHAT
IS A
"SECURITY"?
1)
Introduction
Thus far,
we
have considered,
in
conceptual
terms, what constitutes
a
security
and the
basic characteristics
of
some common examples
of
securities. Now,
we
turn
to a
more detailed examination
of the
legal
meaning
of the
term "security."
The
question
of
what
constitutes
a
"security"
is
central
to the
application
of
securities legislation.
The
application
of
securities legislation depends
on a
finding
that
the
trans-
action
in
question
involves
a
security (although,
as we
shall
see
below,
the
securities regulators sometimes assume jurisdiction even when
there
is no
security1).
Many
requirements
of
securities legislation
are
triggered when "securities"
are
involved, including
the
following:
1 See the
discussion
of
derivatives
in
section
B(12)
below.
23
24
SECURITIES
LAW
1.
The
requirement that
an
issuer prepare
and
distribute
a
prospectus
depends
on
whether there
is a
distribution
of
"securities."2
2.
The
requirement that
an
issuer
publicly
disclose
material changes
in the
life
of the
company (i.e., comply with continuous disclosure
obligations)
depends
on
whether
it has
issued securities (and
whether these securities
are
publicly held, such that
the
company
qualifies
as a
"reporting
issuer").3
3. The
criminal
and
civil prohibitions against insider trading
are
trig-
gered
only when someone with material non-public information
trades
in
securities.4
4. The
application
of the
take-over
bid
rules depends
on
whether
there
is a
take-over
bid to
acquire
the
securities
of an
issuer.5
5.
The
registration requirements
of the
legislation come into play only
when there
is
activity involving
securities.6
What
then
is a
security? Consider
the
following
transactions:
You
buy
shares
or
bonds
of IBM
through
a
broker.
You
buy
shares
or
bonds
in a
small, private
software
company direct-
ly
from
the
company.
You
buy a
unit
in a
real estate limited partnership.
You
buy
units
in a
mutual
fund.
You
lend money
to
your aunt
for the
purpose
of
opening
a
commer-
cial
design studio.
You
buy an
interest
in a
number
of
chinchillas,
in
return
for a
prom-
ise
that
you
will share
in any
profits
generated
by the
sale
of the
chinchillas.
You
open
a
bank account.
You
buy a
life
insurance policy.
You
buy an
interest
in a
time-share condominium unit.
Which
of
these transactions involves
a
security? Most people
would recognize that shares
of a
public company
are
securities. Most
2
Securities
Act
(Ontario),
R.S.O.
1990,
c. S.5
[OSA],
ss.
1(1) (definition
of
"distribution")
& 53.
3
Ibid.
ss.
1(1) (definition
of
"reporting issuer," defined exclusively
in
terms
of the
trading
status
of the
issuer's securities)
& 75.
4
Ibid.
ss. 76 &
130.
5
Ibid.
s.
89(1)
(definition
of
"take-over
bid").
6
Ibid.
ss.
1(1) (definitions
of
"underwriter"
and
"adviser")
& 25
(when
registra-
tion
required).
people would likely recognize that bonds,
or
debentures,7
or
other sim-
ilar
debt instruments issued
by a
public company
are
also securities.
It
is
likely that most people would
similarly
expect that
shares
or
bonds
in a
private company
are
also securities. However, many would
fail
to
recognize that every other transaction
on
this list
may
conceivably
be
characterized
as a
security,
or
could
be so
characterized,
but for
specif-
ic
exclusions
from
the
definition
of
security
found
in the
securities leg-
islation. This shows just
how
wide
the
legal definition
of
security cuts.
2) The
Securities
Act
Definition
How
is it
possible that
so
many things
can be
classified
as
securities?
The
first
place
to
look
for an
answer
is the
definitions section
of the
Act.
In
Ontario,
"security"
is
defined
as
follows:
"security" includes,
(a)
any
document,
instrument
or
writing commonly
known
as a
security,
(b) any
document constituting evidence
of
title
to or
interest
in the
capital, assets, property, profits, earnings
or
royalties
of any
per-
son or
company,
(c)
any
document constituting evidence
of an
interest
in an
associa-
tion
of
legatees
or
heirs,
(d) any
document constituting evidence
of an
option, subscription
or
other interest
in or to a
security,
(e)
any
bond, debenture, note
or
other evidence
of
indebtedness, share,
stock,
unit, unit
certificate,
participation
certificate,
certificate
of
share
or
interest, preorganization
certificate
or
subscription other
than
a
contract
of
insurance issued
by an
insurance company
licensed under
the
Insurance
Act and an
evidence
of
deposit issued
by a
bank listed
in
Schedule
I or II to the
Bank
Act
(Canada),
by a
credit
union
or
league
to
which
the
Credit
Unions
and
Caisses
Populaires
Act,
1994
applies
or by a
loan corporation
or
trust corpo-
ration
registered under
the
Loan
and
Trust
Corporations
Act,
At
one
time,
a
bond
represented secured debt, while
a
debenture represented
unsecured debt
a
distinction,
as
mentioned
in
chapter
1,
that
is
still
found
in
some
finance
texts.
Today,
however,
the
terms "bond"
and
"debenture"
are
often
used interchangeably, although
it
would
be
unusual
to use the
term "debenture"
to
describe
a
debt instrument secured solely
by a
charge
on a
particular
fixed
asset.
Fundamental Securities
Law
Concepts
25
7

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT