Funding conditions for aid effectiveness: A mixed blessing for the sustainable development of host‐country‐national employees

AuthorSharon L. O'Sullivan
Published date01 September 2015
Date01 September 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1318
Funding conditions for aid effectiveness: A mixed
blessing for the sustainable development of host-
country-national employees
Sharon L. OSullivan*
University of Ottawa
Abstract
This paper explores whetherand howaid effectiveness
funding conditions impact the human resource development
of host-country national (HCN) employees. To investigate
this relationship, I conducted a phenomenological study with
31 participants from three international nongovernmental
organizations (INGOs). Results suggest that the pressure
toward funds accountability brings mixed blessings: From
astaff‌ing perspective, more HCNs are being hired instead
of expatriates, building local capacity. However, vital
training and performance review functions are cast as in-
eff‌icient overheads. The paper concludes with a
conceptual framework, practical strategies for INGOs
and donor governments, and directions for larger scale
empirical research. Copyright © 2015 ASAC. Published
by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: staff‌ing, training, performance review,
human resource development, INGOs, aid effectiveness,
host-country nationals
Résumé
Cet article examine dans quelle mesure et de quelle manière les
conditions de f‌inancement de leff‌icacité de laide inf‌luencent le
développement des ressources humaines des employés citoyens
des pays hôtes (HCN). Pour étudier cette relation, une étude
phénoménologique est menée auprès de 31 participants issus
de trois organisations non gouvernementales internationales
(INGOs). Les résultats révèlent que la pression en faveur de
lobligation de rendre des comptes dans la gestion des fonds
produit des avantages mitigés. Du point de vue de la dotation
du personnel, de plus en plus de HCNs sont recrutés en lieu et
place des expatriés, ce qui permet de développer les capacités
locales. Mais dans le même temps, la formation essentielle et
les fonctions de lévaluation de la performance sont perçues
comme des frais généraux ineff‌icaces. Larticle sachève par
un cadre conceptuel, par des stratégies pratiques pour les
INGOs et les gouvernements bailleurs et par des propositions
pour des recherches empiriques de grande envergure.
Mots-clés : dotation du personnel, formation,évaluationde la
performance, développement des ressources humaines, INGOs,
eff‌icacitédelaide, citoyens des pays hôtes
Sustainable development requires more than just the
development of environmentally sustainable socioeconomic in-
frastructure. It also requires human resource development
namely, building the capacity to manage that infrastructure
by developing host-country-nationals(HCN) human rights
and skills (Tomlinson, 2008). Without such human resource
capacity, international development projects would represent
mere charity, perpetuating dependency over the long term
(Lewis, 2007). Accordingly, when international development
nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) receive project
funding from their governmentsoverseasdevelopment assis-
tance (ODA), they are expected to prioritize the building of
HCN capacity (Roberts, Jones III, & Frohling, 2005).
To further ensurethat ODA funds are directed to HCN ca-
pacity building, donor governments from developed nations
such as Canada have begun to collaborate with one another
and with recipient (developing country) governments. They
have institutionalized principlesand practices for aid effective-
ness in the form of international agreements such as the Paris
Declaration and the Accra Agenda for Action (Tomlinson,
2008). In these agreements, recipient governments have taken
ownership for development strategies that will improve their
institutions and tackle corruption (OECD, 2008), and donor
governmentshave agreed to align their funding initiativeswith
these recipientgovernmentsdevelopment strategies to ensure
The author wishes to thank the University of Ottawas Centre for Academic
Leadership for their Research Writing retreats. The author also wishes to
thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for
their 2008 grant, which funded the project upon which this papers data
was based. Additional publications emerging from that data include
OSullivan (2010) and OSullivan (2011), and are listed in the references.
*Please address correspondence to: Sharon L. OSullivan, Telfer School of
Management, University of Ottawa, 55 Laurier Ave East, Ottawa ON,
Canada K1N6N5. Email: sosullivan@telfer.uottawa.ca
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de ladministration
32: 189202 (2015)
Published online 18 May 2015 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1318
Can J Adm Sci
32(3), 189202 (2015)Copyright © 2015 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 189

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT