Gardner et al. v. Hann et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2006 (SC)
| Judge | D.A. Wilson, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Case Date | March 30, 2012 |
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Citations | [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2006 (SC);[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2006;2012 ONSC 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Meady et al. v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp. et al., 2013 ONSC 5568
...plaintiff pay the costs of the successful defendant. Rather he asks that I consider imposing a Sanderson order as per Gardner v. Hann , 2012 ONSC 2006 [ Gardner ] at paras. 15-19, and the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Moore v. Wienecke , 2008 ONCA 162 [ Moore ], which would require th......
-
Hoang et al. v. Vicentini et al., [2014] O.T.C. Uned. 5893
...whether the number of hours claimed are excessive and whether the disbursements incurred are reasonable. [96] In Gardner v. Hann , 2012 ONSC 2006, I fixed the costs following a seven week jury trial. In that case, the Plaintiff sued for damages for injuries sustained arising from a motor ve......
-
Orr v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corp. No. 1056 et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 4919
...the Plaintiff the sum of $200,000 for fees plus $100,000 for disbursements. Should a Sanderson order be issued? [45] In Gardner v. Hann , 2012 ONSC 2006, I considered the issue of when it is appropriate to make a Sanderson order. I stated at paras. 12-18: The general rule in multi-defendant......
-
Hoang et al. v. Vicentini et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5246
...pay the judgment on the part of one Defendant but found there was no basis to delay the determination of costs. [14] In Gardner v. Hann 2012 ONSC 2006, I reviewed the law on Sanderson and Bullock orders and stated: "A Bullock order still requires the Plaintiff to pay the costs of the succes......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
Meady et al. v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp. et al., 2013 ONSC 5568
...plaintiff pay the costs of the successful defendant. Rather he asks that I consider imposing a Sanderson order as per Gardner v. Hann , 2012 ONSC 2006 [ Gardner ] at paras. 15-19, and the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Moore v. Wienecke , 2008 ONCA 162 [ Moore ], which would require th......
-
Hoang et al. v. Vicentini et al., [2014] O.T.C. Uned. 5893
...whether the number of hours claimed are excessive and whether the disbursements incurred are reasonable. [96] In Gardner v. Hann , 2012 ONSC 2006, I fixed the costs following a seven week jury trial. In that case, the Plaintiff sued for damages for injuries sustained arising from a motor ve......
-
Orr v. Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corp. No. 1056 et al., [2012] O.T.C. Uned. 4919
...the Plaintiff the sum of $200,000 for fees plus $100,000 for disbursements. Should a Sanderson order be issued? [45] In Gardner v. Hann , 2012 ONSC 2006, I considered the issue of when it is appropriate to make a Sanderson order. I stated at paras. 12-18: The general rule in multi-defendant......
-
Hoang et al. v. Vicentini et al., [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 5246
...pay the judgment on the part of one Defendant but found there was no basis to delay the determination of costs. [14] In Gardner v. Hann 2012 ONSC 2006, I reviewed the law on Sanderson and Bullock orders and stated: "A Bullock order still requires the Plaintiff to pay the costs of the succes......
Request a trial to view additional results