Garreton v. Complete Innovations Inc., 2016 ONSC 1178
Judge | Pattillo, J. |
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Case Date | February 16, 2016 |
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Citations | 2016 ONSC 1178;[2016] O.A.C. Uned. 133;[2016] O.A.C. Uned. 133 (DC) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 16 December 20, 2019)
...v. Colliers Macaulay Nicholls Inc., 2019 ONCA 679, Amberber v. IBM Canada Ltd., 2018 ONCA 571, Garreton v. Complete Innovations Inc., 2016 ONSC 1178, Dumbrell v. Regional Group of Companies Inc., 2007 ONCA 59 Hilson v. 1336365 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ONCA 1000 Keywords: Contracts, Real Property,......
-
Khashaba v. Procom Consultants Group Ltd., 2018 ONSC 7617
...Nicolls Inc., 2018 ONSC 1256 at paras. 25-26, Covenoho v. Pendylum Ltd., 2017 ONCA 284 at para. 7, Garreton v. Complete Innovations Inc., 2016 ONSC 1178 at para. · Termination provisions must be clear that they are specifying a period of notice other than common law reasonable notice: Macht......
-
Andros v. Colliers Macaulay Nicolls Inc., 2018 ONSC 1256
...ESA under clause 4b. In support of this argument, he relies, in part, on the principle set out in Garreton v. Complete Innovations Inc., 2016 ONSC 1178 (CanLII) (Garreton), which holds that an employment contract must be considered at the time it is executed and that if the termination prov......
-
Fogelman v. IFG,
...of the termination clause, is sufficient to void the entire clause: Rossman, at para. 25, citing Garreton v. Complete Innovations Inc., 2016 ONSC 1178 (Div. Ct.), at para. 27. The termination clause is not to be interpreted with the benefit of hindsight. The termination clause “must ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Khashaba v. Procom Consultants Group Ltd., 2018 ONSC 7617
...Nicolls Inc., 2018 ONSC 1256 at paras. 25-26, Covenoho v. Pendylum Ltd., 2017 ONCA 284 at para. 7, Garreton v. Complete Innovations Inc., 2016 ONSC 1178 at para. · Termination provisions must be clear that they are specifying a period of notice other than common law reasonable notice: Macht......
-
Andros v. Colliers Macaulay Nicolls Inc., 2018 ONSC 1256
...ESA under clause 4b. In support of this argument, he relies, in part, on the principle set out in Garreton v. Complete Innovations Inc., 2016 ONSC 1178 (CanLII) (Garreton), which holds that an employment contract must be considered at the time it is executed and that if the termination prov......
-
Fogelman v. IFG,
...of the termination clause, is sufficient to void the entire clause: Rossman, at para. 25, citing Garreton v. Complete Innovations Inc., 2016 ONSC 1178 (Div. Ct.), at para. 27. The termination clause is not to be interpreted with the benefit of hindsight. The termination clause “must ......
-
Rossman v. Canadian Solar Inc., 2018 ONSC 7172
...Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports Ltd., 2017 ONCA 158, 134 O.R. (3d) 481, at para. 40. [65] As set out in Garreton v. Complete Innovations Inc. 2016 ONSC 1178, the employment contract must be considered at the time it is executed and if the termination provision is not onside with the provisions ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 16 December 20, 2019)
...v. Colliers Macaulay Nicholls Inc., 2019 ONCA 679, Amberber v. IBM Canada Ltd., 2018 ONCA 571, Garreton v. Complete Innovations Inc., 2016 ONSC 1178, Dumbrell v. Regional Group of Companies Inc., 2007 ONCA 59 Hilson v. 1336365 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ONCA 1000 Keywords: Contracts, Real Property,......
-
A New Direction For The Enforceability Of Termination Clauses?
...Wunderman and John A. Ford & Associates Inc. v Keegan, 2014 ONSC 4989. The recent decision in Garreton v Complete Innovations Inc., 2016 ONSC 1178 (Div. Ct.) favours the approach taken in Wunderman, namely, that "the employment contract must be considered at the time it is executed. If ......