Gaur et al. v. Datta et al.,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Rouleau, van Rensburg and Pardu, JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Citation | 2015 ONCA 151,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 124,[2015] O.A.C. Uned. 124 (CA) |
| Date | 12 March 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 30-October 4)
...of Toronto, 2013 ONCA 655, Taylor v Canada (Attorney General), 2012 ONCA 479, Pearson v Inco Ltd., [2001] OTC 919, Gaur v Datta, 2015 ONCA 151, Best v Ranking, 2015 ONSC 6269, Janssen-Ortho Inc. v. Amgen Canada Inc. (2005), 256 DLR (4th) 407, Web Offset Publications Ltd v Vickery (1999), 43......
-
Agnew-Americano v. Equifax Canada Co.,
...hearing. In any event, the court on a motion to strike is entitled to review the documents referred to in the pleadings (Gaur v. Datta, 2015 ONCA 151, at para. 5). [22] All allegations set out in section 2.3(f) are quoted verbatim from the Claim. [23] The pleading refers to “footnote”, but ......
-
Darmar Farms Inc. v. Syngenta Canada Inc.,
...particulars themselves. [41] Darmar argues that ignoring the particulars and the documents attached to them was wrong. In Gaur v. Datta, 2015 ONCA 151, at para. 5, this court held that “[i]n determining whether a cause of action is disclosed, particulars can be considered as part of the ple......
-
Naghshineh v. Zadeh, 2021 ONSC 1132
...that is referred to in the pleadings and forms an integral part of the factual matrix of the claim may be considered, see Gaur v. Datta, 2015 ONCA 151 at para. 5 and McCreight v. Canada, 2013 ONCA 483 at para. 29. [8] The parties in this case agree that t......
Get Started for Free
13 cases
-
Agnew-Americano v. Equifax Canada Co.,
...hearing. In any event, the court on a motion to strike is entitled to review the documents referred to in the pleadings (Gaur v. Datta, 2015 ONCA 151, at para. 5). [22] All allegations set out in section 2.3(f) are quoted verbatim from the Claim. [23] The pleading refers to “footnote”, but ......
-
Darmar Farms Inc. v. Syngenta Canada Inc.,
...particulars themselves. [41] Darmar argues that ignoring the particulars and the documents attached to them was wrong. In Gaur v. Datta, 2015 ONCA 151, at para. 5, this court held that “[i]n determining whether a cause of action is disclosed, particulars can be considered as part of the ple......
-
Naghshineh v. Zadeh, 2021 ONSC 1132
...that is referred to in the pleadings and forms an integral part of the factual matrix of the claim may be considered, see Gaur v. Datta, 2015 ONCA 151 at para. 5 and McCreight v. Canada, 2013 ONCA 483 at para. 29. [8] The parties in this case agree that t......
-
Chuvalo v. Worsoff,
...See paragraph 45 of Joanne’s factum. [32] 2015 ONCA 151, at para. 25. [33] 2014 SCC 12, at para. 2 and 5. [34] G.H.L. Fridman, The Law of......
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (SEPTEMBER 30 – OCTOBER 4 2019)
...of Toronto, 2013 ONCA 655, Taylor v Canada (Attorney General), 2012 ONCA 479, Pearson v Inco Ltd., [2001] OTC 919, Gaur v Datta, 2015 ONCA 151, Best v Ranking, 2015 ONSC 6269, Janssen-Ortho Inc. v. Amgen Canada Inc. (2005), 256 DLR (4th) 407, Web Offset Publications Ltd v Vickery (1999), 43......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 30-October 4)
...of Toronto, 2013 ONCA 655, Taylor v Canada (Attorney General), 2012 ONCA 479, Pearson v Inco Ltd., [2001] OTC 919, Gaur v Datta, 2015 ONCA 151, Best v Ranking, 2015 ONSC 6269, Janssen-Ortho Inc. v. Amgen Canada Inc. (2005), 256 DLR (4th) 407, Web Offset Publications Ltd v Vickery (1999), 43......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 9-13, 2015)
...was no evidence to support the elements of defamation and that the respondents were protected by a qualified privilege. Gaur v Datta,2015 ONCA 151 [Rouleau, van Rensburg and Pardu J.D. Keith and E. Moore, for the appellants C. Olsheski, for the respondents Keywords: Civil Litigation, Rules ......