Gelsinger v. Gelsinger, [2016] Sask.R. Uned. 41 (QB)
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | Goebel, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Subject Matter | PRACTICE,FAMILY LAW |
Citation | [2016] Sask.R. Uned. 41 (QB),2016 SKQB 97,[2016] Sask.R. Uned. 41 |
Date | 18 March 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Flett v. Laidlaw, 2016 SKQB 244
...with the application of Gebert by Justice Megaw in H.(S.) v G.(W.) , 2016 SKQB 114 and by Justice Goebel in Gelsinger v Gelsinger , 2016 SKQB 97. Thus, interim tweaking of access may be permissible if the facts establish that it is in the child's best interests, but a substantial change to ......
-
E.D. v. J.D.,
...and all types of parenting or access alterations, even minor ones, as in Ackerman v Ackerman, 2017 SKQB 7. [15] In Gelsinger v Gelsinger, 2016 SKQB 97 at para 18, Justice Goebel also implemented a tweak to the interim parenting regime in a situation where such a parenting order was establis......
2 cases
-
Flett v. Laidlaw, 2016 SKQB 244
...with the application of Gebert by Justice Megaw in H.(S.) v G.(W.) , 2016 SKQB 114 and by Justice Goebel in Gelsinger v Gelsinger , 2016 SKQB 97. Thus, interim tweaking of access may be permissible if the facts establish that it is in the child's best interests, but a substantial change to ......
-
E.D. v. J.D.,
...and all types of parenting or access alterations, even minor ones, as in Ackerman v Ackerman, 2017 SKQB 7. [15] In Gelsinger v Gelsinger, 2016 SKQB 97 at para 18, Justice Goebel also implemented a tweak to the interim parenting regime in a situation where such a parenting order was establis......