Generational Differences in the Importance, Availability, and Influence of Work Values: A Public Service Perspective
Author | Christopher Smith,Laura Gover,Michael Halinski,Linda Duxbury |
Published date | 01 June 2019 |
Date | 01 June 2019 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1485 |
Generational Differences in the Importance,
Availability, and Influence of Work Values: A
Public Service Perspective
Christopher Smith*
Carleton University
Michael Halinski
Ryerson University
Laura Gover
Vancouver Island University
Linda Duxbury
Carleton University
Abstract
This study uses a sample of 832 Canadian public servants to
test a theoretically derived framework which hypothesizes
that generational cohort: (1) predicts the importance public
servants place on intrinsic and extrinsic work values, (2)
predicts the perceived availability of such rewards in public
service workplaces, and (3) impacts the relationship
between perceived availability of important rewards, organi-
zational commitment, and job satisfaction. Our study adds
to the limited body of research on generational cohort and
work values in the public service. Generational cohort had
little impact on the importance of work values, but did
predict perceived availability of work-rewards and the rela-
tionship between perceived availability of important
rewards, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction.
Findings could help public service organizations’
recruitment and retention efforts. Copyright © 2018 ASAC.
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keywords: generational difference, work values, organiza-
tional commitment, public service, millennials
Résumé
La présente étude s’appuie sur un échantillon de 832
fonctionnaires canadiens pour tester le cadre théorique basé
sur les hypothèses selon lesquelles la cohorte générationnelle:
(1) prédit l’importance que les fonctionnaires accordent aux
valeurs intrinsèques et extrinsèques du travail, (2) prédit la
disponibilité perçue de ces récompenses dans les milieux de tra-
vail de la fonction publique et (3) influesurlarelationentrela
disponibilité perçue de récompenses importantes, l’engagement
organisationnel et la satisfaction au travail. Notre étude
s’ajoute au nombre limité de recherches sur la cohorte
générationnelle et les valeurs liées au travail au sein de la
fonction publique. Elle montre que même si la cohorte
générationnelle a peu d’impact sur l’importance des valeurs
professionnelles, en revanche, elle prédit la disponibilité perçue
des récompenses professionnelles et la relation entre la
disponibilité perçue de récompenses importantes, l’engagement
organisationnel et la satisfaction au travail. Nos résultats
pourraient aider les organisations de la fonction publique dans
leurs efforts de recrutement et de rétention. Copyright © 2018
ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mots-clés: différence générationnelle, valeurs
professionnelles, engagement organisationnel, fonction
publique, millénaires
Introduction
Researchers predict that most of the world’s industrial-
ized nations will face significant skilled labour shortages
within the next decade due to shifting labour market demo-
graphics (Canadian Chamber of Commerce, 2012). In
Canada in 2015, for the first time ever, people over the age
of 65 outnumbered those aged 14 or younger (Statistics
Canada, 2015). The wide-scale retirement of baby boomers
(those born between 1945 and 1964) combined with the
reduced number of younger workers in the labour market
means that organizations will be competing to recruit and
retain a limited number of qualified younger individuals
(Janzen, 2014).
While all organizations are likely to be impacted by
these significant demographic shifts, evidence suggests that
*Please address correspondence to: Chris Smith, Carleton University, Sprott
School of Business, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6.
Email: christophersmith4@cmail.carleton.ca
Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences
Revue canadienne des sciences de l’administration
36: 177–192 (2019)
Published online 23 March 2018 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/CJAS.1485
Can J Adm Sci
36(2), 177–192 (2019)Copyright © 2018 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 177
public service employers are more vulnerable to these labour
market shifts than their private sector counterparts. Reasons
for this assertion include data suggesting that the bureau-
cratic nature of the public service makes it difficult to com-
pete with the private sector for qualified candidates. As
Coombs (2009) explains, public sector recruitment processes
are slow and cumbersome compared to those in the private
sector and compensation packages are often not competitive.
Also relevant are data showing that on average, public sector
workers tend to be older than their private sector counterparts,
and Canadian public servants retire at a higher rate and a
younger average age than their counterparts in other sectors
(Lammam, Palacios, Ren, & Clemens, 2015).
Generational cohort theory provides a useful lens
through which to examine this issue. This theory was ad-
vanced by Mannheim (1952) who argued that people who
are born in the same temporal, geographic, and cultural loca-
tion grow to view the world through a similar “generational”
lens due to “their unique location in the stream of history”
(Ryder, 1965, p. 844). Generational cohort is believed to
influence members’“feelings toward authority and organiza-
tions, what they desire from work, and how they plan to
satisfy those desires”(Smola & Sutton, 2002, p. 364).
Three generations are currently common within the
North American workforce and therefore within our study:
baby boomer, Generation X (i.e. Gen X) and millennial
(i.e. Gen Y). Our review of the literature showed that the
boundaries used to delineate the different generations vary
between studies (Gursoy, Maier, and Chi, 2008; Smola &
Sutton, 2002). To maintain consistency with the much of
the work done by others in this area, this study uses the same
boundaries as two of the most prolific contemporary genera-
tional cohort researchers: Twenge and Lyons. The baby
boomer (“boomers”) generation includes those born roughly
between 1946 and 1965, a period that overlaps with the
accelerated birthrates in Canada and the USA that followed
the end of the Second World War (Zemke, Raines, &
Filipczak, 2000). Generation X includes those born around
1965 and 1980, a period that corresponds to the lull in birth-
rates that occurred between the end of the baby boom and
the period in which boomers began to start families of their
own (Lyons 2003; Zemke et al., 2000). The Millennial gen-
eration includes those born after 1980, a time period that
aligns with the increase in birth rates that can be attributed
to boomers entering parenthood (Zemke et al., 2000).
While there is a growing body of literature indicating
that work values vary across generational cohorts (including
Twenge & Campbell, 2012; Lyons, 2015), two features of
this work limit its ability to inform recruitment and retention
practices for Canadian public service employers. First, very
little of this research has been undertaken within a public
service context. Much of the work in the area relies on his-
torical data from students (Twenge, 2006, 2010; Krahn &
Galambos, 2013; De Cooman & Dries, 2012). The rest of
the research on generational cohorts (Cennamo & Gardner,
2008; Hansen & Leuty, 2012; Kowske, Rash, & Wiley,
2010; Lyons, Duxbury and Higgins, 2006) uses samples
made up of both private and public sector workers and draws
conclusions that are not specific to the public service. Sec-
ond, those studies that do focus on the public service look
at a restricted set of generations in their study. Some (such
as Jurkiewicz & Brown, 1998; Benson & Brown, 2011)
compare only the baby boomer and Gen X cohorts. Others
(such as Ng & Gossett, 2013) focus only on the millennial
cohort. This study is motivated by the current absence of re-
search into the relationship between generational cohort and
work values in the public service context. Findings from this
study should provide both policy makers and academics
with valuable insights into how best to recruit and retain
knowledge workers of all ages into the public service.
Literature Review
This study has three objectives: (1) to explore the extent
to which generational cohort predicts the perceived impor-
tance of intrinsic and extrinsic work values; (2) to explore
the extent to which generational cohort predicts the per-
ceived availability of valued work rewards; and (3) to exam-
ine how generational cohort impacts the relationship
between perceived availability of important rewards, organi-
zational commitment, and job satisfaction. Our analysis con-
sists of two main stages. The first stage, which addresses
objectives 1 and 2, is theoretically rooted in the generational
cohort literature (Mannheim, 1952). The second stage,
which addresses our third research objective, is theoretically
grounded in the person–environment fit literature (Chatman,
1989; Dawis, 1992; Kristoff, 1996). In this literature review
we present relevant findings from the extant literature related
to generational differences and work values (that is, related
to objectives 1 and 2) and person–environment fit (related
to objective 3). The hypotheses that are derived from these
literatures are presented at the end of this section.
Generational Differences and Work Values
Dose (2007) defines work values as “evaluative stan-
dards relating to work or the work environment by which in-
dividuals discern what is ‘right’or assess the importance of
preferences”(p. 227). Work values are theoretically similar
to general values (Ros, Schwartz, & Surkiss, 1999) in that
both are viewed as being hierarchically ordered within our
cognitive maps based on their importance (Ros et al.,
1999). While general values guide us in day to day life
“work values relate to what people want to do, or want to
have, in the workplace”(De Cooman & Dries, 2012, p. 43).
Work values are thought to be very stable with significant in-
fluence over the perceptions, goals, and decisions of job
hunters (De Cooman & Dries, 2012). Any tangible or
GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN PUBLIC SERVICE WORK VALUES SMITH ET AL.
Can J Adm Sci
36(2), 177–192 (2019)Copyright © 2018 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 178
To continue reading
Request your trial