Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409

CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice J.J. Gill
Citation2018 ABQB 409
Date22 May 2018
Docket Number1803 03187

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 practice notes
  • Latham (Re), 2018 ABQB 906
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 2, 2018
    ...(2d) 194; Boviz v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 110 at paras 11-17, confirmed 2018 ABQB 215; Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409 at paras 44-46; Shoemaker v Canada (Drumheller Institution), 2018 ABQB 851 at paras [13] Mr. Latham’s proposed habeas corpus application sa......
  • Heiser v Bowden Institution, 2021 ABQB 1007
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 16, 2021
    ...para 132; Boviz v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 110 at paras 11-17, confirmed 2018 ABQB 215; Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409 at paras 44-46; Shoemaker v Canada (Drumheller Institution), 2018 ABQB 851 at paras 45-51, rev’d on other grounds 2019 ABCA 266; Lat......
  • Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 632
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 29, 2018
    ...dismissed an application for habeas corpus by Ryan David Jones Getschel [Getschel], reported as Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409 [Getschel #1]. Getschel claimed that his transfer from the minimum security Grierson Institution to the medium security Bowden Institution was ......
  • Lee v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 464
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 15, 2018
    ...habeas corpus is a way to damage awards, are circulating in the Bowden Institution, as reviewed in Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409 at paras 74-89. Attempts to bootstrap damages and civil claims via habeas corpus are a particularly serious abuse of the habeas corpus [68] ......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • Latham (Re), 2018 ABQB 906
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 2, 2018
    ...(2d) 194; Boviz v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 110 at paras 11-17, confirmed 2018 ABQB 215; Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409 at paras 44-46; Shoemaker v Canada (Drumheller Institution), 2018 ABQB 851 at paras [13] Mr. Latham’s proposed habeas corpus application sa......
  • Heiser v Bowden Institution, 2021 ABQB 1007
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 16, 2021
    ...para 132; Boviz v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 110 at paras 11-17, confirmed 2018 ABQB 215; Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409 at paras 44-46; Shoemaker v Canada (Drumheller Institution), 2018 ABQB 851 at paras 45-51, rev’d on other grounds 2019 ABCA 266; Lat......
  • Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 632
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 29, 2018
    ...dismissed an application for habeas corpus by Ryan David Jones Getschel [Getschel], reported as Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409 [Getschel #1]. Getschel claimed that his transfer from the minimum security Grierson Institution to the medium security Bowden Institution was ......
  • Lee v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 464
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 15, 2018
    ...habeas corpus is a way to damage awards, are circulating in the Bowden Institution, as reviewed in Getschel v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 ABQB 409 at paras 74-89. Attempts to bootstrap damages and civil claims via habeas corpus are a particularly serious abuse of the habeas corpus [68] ......
  • Get Started for Free