GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd.

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
JudgeCaldwell,Kalmakoff,Ryan-Froslie
Citation2022 SKCA 38
Docket NumberCACV3671
Date24 March 2022

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
35 practice notes
  • Bourgault Industries Ltd. v. Graham
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 28, 2024
    ...to an application to strike pursuant to Rule 7-9(2)(e), the court in GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd., 2022 SKCA 38, 29 CLR (5th) 294 [GHC], stated as 25 Striking a claim under Rule 7-9(2)(e) is not a remedy to be lightly granted. A claim should be struck under t......
  • Standing Buffalo Dakota First Nation v. Maurice
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • March 12, 2024
    ...relates to the overall sufficiency of a claim or defence and, as noted in GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd., 2022 SKCA 38 at paras 25-26, 29 CLR (5th) 294, so that I must find that it is “plain and obvious” that a claim is bound to fail before it can be struck und......
  • Abrametz v Law Society of Saskatchewan
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 13, 2023
    ...see, for example: McStay v Berta Estate, 2021 SKCA 51, 458 DLR (4th) 106; GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd., 2022 SKCA 38 at para 37; Suderman v Yakubowski-Suderman, 2022 SKCA 87 at para 71; and Larocque v Yahoo, 2023 SKCA 63 at para [26] In MacInnis and in Stromb......
  • Graham Design Builders LP v. Mod-Panel Manufacturing Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 23, 2025
    ...affidavit evidence in reviewing the merit of the claim being advanced. In GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd., 2022 SKCA 38 at para 26, 29 CLR (5th) 294, the Court of Appeal reiterated the long-standing procedure identified in Sagon v Royal Bank of Canada (1992), 10......
  • Get Started for Free
38 cases
  • Bourgault Industries Ltd. v. Graham
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 28, 2024
    ...to an application to strike pursuant to Rule 7-9(2)(e), the court in GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd., 2022 SKCA 38, 29 CLR (5th) 294 [GHC], stated as 25 Striking a claim under Rule 7-9(2)(e) is not a remedy to be lightly granted. A claim should be struck under t......
  • Standing Buffalo Dakota First Nation v. Maurice
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • March 12, 2024
    ...relates to the overall sufficiency of a claim or defence and, as noted in GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd., 2022 SKCA 38 at paras 25-26, 29 CLR (5th) 294, so that I must find that it is “plain and obvious” that a claim is bound to fail before it can be struck und......
  • Graham Design Builders LP v. Mod-Panel Manufacturing Ltd.
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • June 23, 2025
    ...affidavit evidence in reviewing the merit of the claim being advanced. In GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd., 2022 SKCA 38 at para 26, 29 CLR (5th) 294, the Court of Appeal reiterated the long-standing procedure identified in Sagon v Royal Bank of Canada (1992), 10......
  • METANCZUK v. WATSON
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 29, 2023
    ...Inc., 2020 SKCA 39, 447 DLR (4th) 316 [Venture]. While the Court in GHC Swift Current Realty Inc. v BACZ Engineering (2004) Ltd., 2022 SKCA 38, made a general statement at para. 28 that s. 6 of The Limitations Act is a codification of the common law rule of discoverability, no legal analysi......
  • Get Started for Free