Go Ha & Associates Ltd. v. 611414 B.C. Ltd., 2018 BCSC 2118

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeW.A. Baker
Citation2018 BCSC 2118
Date30 November 2018
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberS1710849
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Specific Performance: Sale of Land
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...had grown up in as a child, 48 and where a home 38 ADAG , above note 18 at paras 166–68. 39 Go Ha & Associates Ltd v 611414 BC Ltd , 2018 BCSC 2118 [ Go Ha ], speciic performance of an option to purchase contract. See also McLaughlin , above note 37, var’d on appeal on an unrelated issue 20......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...4284 ....... 505 Glooscap Heritage Society v Canada (National Revenue), 2012 FCA 255 .....44, 47 Go Ha & Associates Ltd v 611414 BC Ltd, 2018 BCSC 2118 .....................494, 508 Godin v Godin, 2012 NSCA 54 .......................................................................... 605 Go......
  • SHH Management Limited v. Philip, 2020 BCSC 1411
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 22, 2020
    ...of its own default nor can he take advantage of a state of affairs that he has produced: Go Ha & Associates Ltd. v. 611414 B.C. Ltd., 2018 BCSC 2118 at paras. 38–39, quoting McLaughlin v. Canadian Service Management Inc., 2018 ONSC 1937 at paras. 49, 52. Furthermore, the plaintiffs have......
  • Tut v. Evershine Land Group Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 12, 2021
    ...plaintiff has no grounds to argue that its right to specific performance is preserved: Go Ha & Associates Ltd v. 611414 B.C. Ltd., 2018 BCSC 2118 at paras. [47] As a result of both the plaintiff’s failure to fulfill its obligations and the unreasonable delay, the plaintiff's claim for s......
2 cases
  • SHH Management Limited v. Philip, 2020 BCSC 1411
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 22, 2020
    ...of its own default nor can he take advantage of a state of affairs that he has produced: Go Ha & Associates Ltd. v. 611414 B.C. Ltd., 2018 BCSC 2118 at paras. 38–39, quoting McLaughlin v. Canadian Service Management Inc., 2018 ONSC 1937 at paras. 49, 52. Furthermore, the plaintiffs have......
  • Tut v. Evershine Land Group Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 12, 2021
    ...plaintiff has no grounds to argue that its right to specific performance is preserved: Go Ha & Associates Ltd v. 611414 B.C. Ltd., 2018 BCSC 2118 at paras. [47] As a result of both the plaintiff’s failure to fulfill its obligations and the unreasonable delay, the plaintiff's claim for s......
2 books & journal articles
  • Specific Performance: Sale of Land
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...had grown up in as a child, 48 and where a home 38 ADAG , above note 18 at paras 166–68. 39 Go Ha & Associates Ltd v 611414 BC Ltd , 2018 BCSC 2118 [ Go Ha ], speciic performance of an option to purchase contract. See also McLaughlin , above note 37, var’d on appeal on an unrelated issue 20......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...4284 ....... 505 Glooscap Heritage Society v Canada (National Revenue), 2012 FCA 255 .....44, 47 Go Ha & Associates Ltd v 611414 BC Ltd, 2018 BCSC 2118 .....................494, 508 Godin v Godin, 2012 NSCA 54 .......................................................................... 605 Go......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT