Go v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) et al., 2016 FC 1021
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Gleeson, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,EXTRADITION,CIVIL RIGHTS,CRIMINAL LAW |
| Date | 08 September 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Cervenakova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 477
...the adequacy of state protection for someone in circumstances similar to those of the claimant: Go v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1021 (Gleeson J.), at para 13. It is not necessary for the claimant to have sought protection personally from the state if the claimant can show......
-
Rstic v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 249
...Croatian authorities could provide the Applicant with “necessary protection” (Go v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1021 at para 13). [34] The Applicant cites Gilvaja and Joseph, where this Court found that the Refugee Protection Division and a PRRA officer erred by......
2 cases
-
Cervenakova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...the adequacy of state protection for someone in circumstances similar to those of the claimant: Go v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1021 (Gleeson J.), at para 13. It is not necessary for the claimant to have sought protection personally from the state if the claimant can show......
-
Rstic v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 249
...Croatian authorities could provide the Applicant with “necessary protection” (Go v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 1021 at para 13). [34] The Applicant cites Gilvaja and Joseph, where this Court found that the Refugee Protection Division and a PRRA officer erred by......