O'Grady v. Bell Canada, 2020 FC 535
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 20 April 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Hughes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 147
...of a decision in the human rights context: Bangloy v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 60 at paras 26-27; O’Grady v Bell Canada, 2020 FC 535 at para 30 [O’Grady]). [47] On a reasonableness review, the Court must examine the Tribunal’s Decision to determine whether its ......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada,
...the Tribunal’s expertise in light of a lengthy, complex case comprised of mostly uncontested rulings (O’Grady v Bell Canada, 2020 FC 535 at para 31). [77] The AFN states that the Court should accord respectful deference to the factual and legal determinations of the Tribunal g......
-
Seaspan Marine Corporation v. Smolik, 2023 FC 856
...Commission), 2019 FCA 251 at para 6, application for leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38956 (23 April 2020); O’Grady v Bell Canada, 2020 FC 535 at para 31 [O’Grady]). [46] A reasonableness review requires a court to consider both the outcome of the decision and the underlying r......
-
Ottawa (City) v. Todd, 2022 FC 579
...are owed deference and the Court is to adopt a “posture of restraint” when considering them: O'Grady v Bell Canada, 2020 FC 535, at para 31; Vavilov at para 24. [78] The City has not shown the challenged finding by the CHRT was in error. To the contrary, on cross-examinat......
4 cases
-
Hughes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 147
...of a decision in the human rights context: Bangloy v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 60 at paras 26-27; O’Grady v Bell Canada, 2020 FC 535 at para 30 [O’Grady]). [47] On a reasonableness review, the Court must examine the Tribunal’s Decision to determine whether its ......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada,
...the Tribunal’s expertise in light of a lengthy, complex case comprised of mostly uncontested rulings (O’Grady v Bell Canada, 2020 FC 535 at para 31). [77] The AFN states that the Court should accord respectful deference to the factual and legal determinations of the Tribunal g......
-
Seaspan Marine Corporation v. Smolik, 2023 FC 856
...Commission), 2019 FCA 251 at para 6, application for leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38956 (23 April 2020); O’Grady v Bell Canada, 2020 FC 535 at para 31 [O’Grady]). [46] A reasonableness review requires a court to consider both the outcome of the decision and the underlying r......
-
Ottawa (City) v. Todd, 2022 FC 579
...are owed deference and the Court is to adopt a “posture of restraint” when considering them: O'Grady v Bell Canada, 2020 FC 535, at para 31; Vavilov at para 24. [78] The City has not shown the challenged finding by the CHRT was in error. To the contrary, on cross-examinat......