Graff v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 185
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Zinn, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE |
| Citation | [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 185,[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 185 (FC),2015 FC 437 |
| Date | 10 April 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Bakos v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 71
...an operational level, rather than the efforts made to correct discrimination ( Graff v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2015 FC 437 at para 27 [ Graff ]; Beharry v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2011 FC 111 at para 9 [ Beharry ]). [27] The Applicant cit......
-
Balaz et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 138 (FC)
...institutions have neither the mandate nor the means to provide protection to citizens, see Graff v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration ), 2015 FC 437 at paragraph 24. [36] The foregoing applications of the test are reviewable on a standard of reasonableness. I find that the cumulative weigh......
-
G.S. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 599
...and convincing evidence that the state cannot provide protection. [5] As well, citing (Graff v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)), 2015 FC 437, the RAD noted its obligation to consider the operational adequacy of state protection, rather than simply the willingness of the state or the ef......
-
Kerdikoshvili v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship), 2017 FC 555
...institutions are presumed not to have the means or mandate to assume that responsibility (Graff v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 437 at para 24 (“Graff”); Katinszki v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 1326 at para 15 (“Katinszki”); Flores Zepeda v Canada (Citizens......
4 cases
-
Bakos v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 71
...an operational level, rather than the efforts made to correct discrimination ( Graff v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2015 FC 437 at para 27 [ Graff ]; Beharry v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2011 FC 111 at para 9 [ Beharry ]). [27] The Applicant cit......
-
Balaz et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 138 (FC)
...institutions have neither the mandate nor the means to provide protection to citizens, see Graff v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration ), 2015 FC 437 at paragraph 24. [36] The foregoing applications of the test are reviewable on a standard of reasonableness. I find that the cumulative weigh......
-
G.S. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 599
...and convincing evidence that the state cannot provide protection. [5] As well, citing (Graff v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)), 2015 FC 437, the RAD noted its obligation to consider the operational adequacy of state protection, rather than simply the willingness of the state or the ef......
-
Kerdikoshvili v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship), 2017 FC 555
...institutions are presumed not to have the means or mandate to assume that responsibility (Graff v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 437 at para 24 (“Graff”); Katinszki v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 1326 at para 15 (“Katinszki”); Flores Zepeda v Canada (Citizens......