Grand Central Properties Inc. et al. v. Cochrane (Town) et al., [2013] A.R. Uned. 29
| Judge | O'Brien, J.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,LAND REGULATION,POLLUTION CONTROL,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW |
| Citation | [2013] A.R. Uned. 29,2013 ABCA 69,[2013] A.R. Uned. 29 (CA) |
| Date | 22 February 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 practice notes
-
Alberta (Minister of Municipal Affairs) v Ember Resources Inc., 2018 ABQB 971
...at para 41). [23] O’Brien JA stated in Grand Central Properties Inc. v Cochrane (Town), 2013 ABCA 69, at paragraph 18: . . . The Applicants apparently decided to take the chance that the Board would treat their grounds . . . favourably. Havin......
-
Sellors v. Greenview No. 16 (Municipal District) et al., 2016 ABCA 312
...on commercial activity of various kinds: see s 686(2) of the Municipal Government Act ; Grand Central Properties Inc v Cochrane (Town), 2013 ABCA 69 at paras 16-18. [19] In the context of process concerns about timing, the SDAB was expected to hold the appeal within 30 days of the filing of......
-
Gilbert v. Subdivision and Development Appeal Board (South County Intermunicipal) et al., 2014 ABCA 84
...an appeal if it is important to the applicant and important for jurisprudential purposes: Grand Central Properties Inc v Cochrane (Town) , 2013 ABCA 69 at para 31 (single JA); PVO Ltd v Mackenzie (Municipal District No 23) , 2003 ABCA 83 at para 8, 327 AR 99 (single JA). Standard of review ......
-
Yee v. Leduc (County) et al., 2016 ABCA 40
...the dispute between the parties in order to satisfy the sufficient importance element: Grand Central Properties Inc v Cochrane (Town ), 2013 ABCA 69 at para 31, 10 MPLR (5th) 39; Carleo Investments Ltd v Strathcona (County) , 2014 ABCA 302 at para 10, 28 MPLR (5th) 173. [11] The applicable ......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
Alberta (Minister of Municipal Affairs) v Ember Resources Inc., 2018 ABQB 971
...at para 41). [23] O’Brien JA stated in Grand Central Properties Inc. v Cochrane (Town), 2013 ABCA 69, at paragraph 18: . . . The Applicants apparently decided to take the chance that the Board would treat their grounds . . . favourably. Havin......
-
Sellors v. Greenview No. 16 (Municipal District) et al., 2016 ABCA 312
...on commercial activity of various kinds: see s 686(2) of the Municipal Government Act ; Grand Central Properties Inc v Cochrane (Town), 2013 ABCA 69 at paras 16-18. [19] In the context of process concerns about timing, the SDAB was expected to hold the appeal within 30 days of the filing of......
-
Gilbert v. Subdivision and Development Appeal Board (South County Intermunicipal) et al., 2014 ABCA 84
...an appeal if it is important to the applicant and important for jurisprudential purposes: Grand Central Properties Inc v Cochrane (Town) , 2013 ABCA 69 at para 31 (single JA); PVO Ltd v Mackenzie (Municipal District No 23) , 2003 ABCA 83 at para 8, 327 AR 99 (single JA). Standard of review ......
-
Yee v. Leduc (County) et al., 2016 ABCA 40
...the dispute between the parties in order to satisfy the sufficient importance element: Grand Central Properties Inc v Cochrane (Town ), 2013 ABCA 69 at para 31, 10 MPLR (5th) 39; Carleo Investments Ltd v Strathcona (County) , 2014 ABCA 302 at para 10, 28 MPLR (5th) 173. [11] The applicable ......
Request a trial to view additional results