Grant v. Sandhu, 2019 BCSC 2236
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Norell |
| Citation | 2019 BCSC 2236 |
| Date | 27 December 2019 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S43398 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Instafund Mortgage Management Corp. v. Garrow, 2020 BCSC 1017
...hardship. Generalizations unsupported by specific proof of hardship and inconvenience are insufficient, as discussed in Grant v. Sandhu. 2019 BCSC 2236: [34] The affidavits contain vague conclusory statements, such as the "bank is not pleased" with the CPL. There is no corresponde......
-
2024 BCSC 1334,
...hardship. Generalizations unsupported by specific proof of hardship and inconvenience are insufficient, as discussed in Grant v. Sandhu. 2019 BCSC 2236: [34] The affidavits contain vague conclusory statements, such as the “bank is not pleased” with the CPL. There is no correspondence from t......
-
Smith v Howse,
...hardship. Generalizations unsupported by specific proof of hardship and inconvenience are insufficient, as discussed in Grant v. Sandhu. 2019 BCSC 2236: [34] The affidavits contain vague conclusory statements, such as the “bank is not pleased” with the CPL. There is no correspondence from t......
3 cases
-
Instafund Mortgage Management Corp. v. Garrow, 2020 BCSC 1017
...hardship. Generalizations unsupported by specific proof of hardship and inconvenience are insufficient, as discussed in Grant v. Sandhu. 2019 BCSC 2236: [34] The affidavits contain vague conclusory statements, such as the "bank is not pleased" with the CPL. There is no corresponde......
-
2024 BCSC 1334,
...hardship. Generalizations unsupported by specific proof of hardship and inconvenience are insufficient, as discussed in Grant v. Sandhu. 2019 BCSC 2236: [34] The affidavits contain vague conclusory statements, such as the “bank is not pleased” with the CPL. There is no correspondence from t......
-
Smith v Howse,
...hardship. Generalizations unsupported by specific proof of hardship and inconvenience are insufficient, as discussed in Grant v. Sandhu. 2019 BCSC 2236: [34] The affidavits contain vague conclusory statements, such as the “bank is not pleased” with the CPL. There is no correspondence from t......