Grant v. Sandhu
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Norell |
| Citation | 2019 BCSC 2236 |
| Docket Number | S43398 |
| Date | 27 December 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Instafund Mortgage Management Corp. v. Garrow
...hardship. Generalizations unsupported by specific proof of hardship and inconvenience are insufficient, as discussed in Grant v. Sandhu. 2019 BCSC 2236: [34] The affidavits contain vague conclusory statements, such as the "bank is not pleased" with the CPL. There is no corresponde......
-
Barbieri Estate v White
...the evidentiary standard that an applicant is normally required to meet on an application such as this. For example, in Grant v. Sandhu, 2019 BCSC 2236, Norell J. refused to cancel a CPL because the evidence adduced by the applicant in that case was seen to be deficient. Among the deficienc......
-
Smith v Howse
...hardship. Generalizations unsupported by specific proof of hardship and inconvenience are insufficient, as discussed in Grant v. Sandhu. 2019 BCSC 2236: [34] The affidavits contain vague conclusory statements, such as the “bank is not pleased” with the CPL. There is no correspondence from t......
3 cases
-
Instafund Mortgage Management Corp. v. Garrow
...hardship. Generalizations unsupported by specific proof of hardship and inconvenience are insufficient, as discussed in Grant v. Sandhu. 2019 BCSC 2236: [34] The affidavits contain vague conclusory statements, such as the "bank is not pleased" with the CPL. There is no corresponde......
-
Barbieri Estate v White
...the evidentiary standard that an applicant is normally required to meet on an application such as this. For example, in Grant v. Sandhu, 2019 BCSC 2236, Norell J. refused to cancel a CPL because the evidence adduced by the applicant in that case was seen to be deficient. Among the deficienc......
-
Smith v Howse
...hardship. Generalizations unsupported by specific proof of hardship and inconvenience are insufficient, as discussed in Grant v. Sandhu. 2019 BCSC 2236: [34] The affidavits contain vague conclusory statements, such as the “bank is not pleased” with the CPL. There is no correspondence from t......