Grewal v. Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP, 2019 BCSC 1963
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Horsman |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | November 15, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2019 BCSC 1963 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Betser-Zilevitch v Prowse Chowne LLP,
...of an appeal of that action: Nash v Crick (1996), 17 BCLR (3d) 152 (SC). However, as noted in Grewal v Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP¸ 2019 BCSC 1963 this principle necessarily turns on the wording of the particular agreement. [70] The CFA in this case was silent as to the effect of an appeal an......
-
Kemp Estate v. Ross (A.M. Ross Law Corporation),
...(1999), 68 B.C.L.R. (3d) 340 at para. 10. [97] In Grewal v. Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP, 2019 BCSC 1963, Justice Horsman confirmed that “[a] lawyer’s bill can be reviewed under s. 70 of the LPA even where a fee agreement has be......
2 cases
-
Betser-Zilevitch v Prowse Chowne LLP,
...of an appeal of that action: Nash v Crick (1996), 17 BCLR (3d) 152 (SC). However, as noted in Grewal v Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP¸ 2019 BCSC 1963 this principle necessarily turns on the wording of the particular agreement. [70] The CFA in this case was silent as to the effect of an appeal an......
-
Kemp Estate v. Ross (A.M. Ross Law Corporation),
...(1999), 68 B.C.L.R. (3d) 340 at para. 10. [97] In Grewal v. Jenkins Marzban Logan LLP, 2019 BCSC 1963, Justice Horsman confirmed that “[a] lawyer’s bill can be reviewed under s. 70 of the LPA even where a fee agreement has be......