Grivas v. Air Canada, [2006] F.T.R. Uned. 512
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Tremblay-Lamer, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS,CRIMINAL LAW |
| Date | 21 June 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Selig v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2018 NSSC 116
...needs to be off for three weeks. One of us is not getting the true story…. [Emphasis added] [74] I observe that in Grivas v. Air Canada, 2006 FC 793, it was 31. … Neither Air Canada nor the Commission disputed the applicant's medical condition, his inability to work in his previous position......
-
Wallace v. Symcor, 2007 FC 1289
...was being conducted at the screening stage of the complaint at which there is no right to an oral hearing: Grivas v. Air Canada , 2006 FC 793, [2006] F.C.J. No. 1096. [18] The applicant also complained during the hearing that the mediation attempted by the Commission was ineffective because......
2 cases
-
Selig v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2018 NSSC 116
...needs to be off for three weeks. One of us is not getting the true story…. [Emphasis added] [74] I observe that in Grivas v. Air Canada, 2006 FC 793, it was 31. … Neither Air Canada nor the Commission disputed the applicant's medical condition, his inability to work in his previous position......
-
Wallace v. Symcor, 2007 FC 1289
...was being conducted at the screening stage of the complaint at which there is no right to an oral hearing: Grivas v. Air Canada , 2006 FC 793, [2006] F.C.J. No. 1096. [18] The applicant also complained during the hearing that the mediation attempted by the Commission was ineffective because......