Guérin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 94
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 94 |
| Date | 29 January 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Alsaloussi v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 364
...involved “cruel and unusual punishment as that term is constitutionally understood” (Shamir at para 30; Guérin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 94 at para 68). I find no such evidence in this case. IV. [97] For the foregoing reasons, Mr. Alsaloussi’s application for judicial review will......
-
Corus Entertainment Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 1064
...not state the source of its authority for imposing the publication bans, it was not required to do so (Guérin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 94 at para. 40). In that regard, it is of note that the decision states that it was the Appropriate Officer Representative, on behalf of the RC......
-
Johnson v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 582
...constitute cruel or unusual punishment, such as to even engage the values of section 12 (see generally Guérin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 94 at para 68). [36] Similarly, with respect to section 15, as the ACP indicated in his decision, the National Food Menu standardizes inmate mea......
-
Shamir v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 769
...SCC 41 at para 17), or “cruel and unusual punishment” as that term is constitutionally understood (see Guérin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 94 at para 68). Neither has Mr. Shamir put forward sufficient facts to ground his Charter arguments (Johnson at para 40). [31] However, in Canad......
5 cases
-
Alsaloussi v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 364
...involved “cruel and unusual punishment as that term is constitutionally understood” (Shamir at para 30; Guérin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 94 at para 68). I find no such evidence in this case. IV. [97] For the foregoing reasons, Mr. Alsaloussi’s application for judicial review will......
-
Creelman v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 61
...deductions to inmates’ pay: Johnston v Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 352 at para 48; Guérin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 94 at para 36 [Guérin]. Indeed in Guérin, Justice Roy found that section 78 was “worded by Parliament with exemplary precision&#......
-
Johnson v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 582
...constitute cruel or unusual punishment, such as to even engage the values of section 12 (see generally Guérin v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 94 at para 68). [36] Similarly, with respect to section 15, as the ACP indicated in his decision, the National Food Menu standardizes inmate mea......
-
Corus Entertainment Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 1064
...not state the source of its authority for imposing the publication bans, it was not required to do so (Guérin v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 94 at para. 40). In that regard, it is of note that the decision states that it was the Appropriate Officer Representative, on behalf of the RC......
Request a trial to view additional results