Guignard v. Hall, (2012) 408 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (TD)
Judge | Léger, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada) |
Case Date | December 07, 2012 |
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Citations | (2012), 408 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (TD);2013 NBQB 7 |
Guignard v. Hall (2012), 408 N.B.R.(2d) 1 (TD);
408 R.N.-B.(2e) 1; 1058 A.P.R. 1
MLB headnote and full text
Sommaire et texte intégral
[English language version only]
[Version en langue anglaise seulement]
.........................
Temp. Cite: [2013] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. SE.025
Renvoi temp.: [2013] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. SE.025
Michel Guignard (plaintiff) v. Brian Hall and Denis Hall (defendants)
(B/C/501/96; 2013 NBQB 7; 2013 NBBR 7)
Indexed As: Guignard v. Hall
Répertorié: Guignard v. Hall
New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench
Trial Division
Judicial District of Bathurst
Léger, J.
December 7, 2012.
Summary:
Résumé:
The plaintiff sued for damages from injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident in 1996. He was presently 44. The defendants admitted liability.
The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, allowed the action, awarding damages in a total of $1,105,362.
Damage Awards - Topic 54
Injury and death - Body injuries - Spleen - The plaintiff was a front seat passenger in a vehicle owned by the defendant Denis Hall and operated by the defendant Brian Hall - The plaintiff was seriously injured when the vehicle left the roadway and struck a telephone pole - The plaintiff suffered multiple injuries, including a fracture of the left scapula (shoulder blade), ribs fractures, fracture of the right femoral neck and a ruptured spleen, which required a splenectomy - The injuries were permanent and chronic in nature - The plaintiff had also been diagnosed with depression - Since the accident the plaintiff had been in constant pain by reason of his injuries - Despite efforts to return to gainful employment, the plaintiff had not been able to maintain employment - Prior to the accident, the plaintiff was a talented tattoo artist and had plans to open his own tattoo shop - He tried to return to school in order to upgrade his education so that he might be able to do something - That had not worked out - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, awarded damages as follows: general damages $100,000; interest on general damages $65,190; past loss of income $230,500; interest on past loss of income $77,400; future loss of income $420,800; loss of valuable services $29,400; future loss of valuable services (reduced capacity of 10%) $42,500; massage therapy $50,700 and future cost of medication $88,872 for a total of $1,105,362 - See paragraphs 84 to 182.
Damage Awards - Topic 56
Injury and death - Body injuries - Chest (incl. lungs and ribs) - [See Damage Awards - Topic 54 ].
Damage Awards - Topic 57
Injury and death - Body injuries - Shoulder - [See Damage Awards - Topic 54 ].
Damage Awards - Topic 180
Injury and death - Neck injuries - Fracture - [See Damage Awards - Topic 54 ].
Damage Awards - Topic 491
Injury and death - General damage awards - Loss of valuable services - [See Damage Awards - Topic 54 ].
Damage Awards - Topic 492.1
Injury and death - General damage awards - Pretrial income loss - [See Damage Awards - Topic 54 ].
Damage Awards - Topic 493
Injury and death - General damage awards - Loss of prospective earnings - [See Damage Awards - Topic 54 ].
Torts - Topic 6610
Defences - Contributory negligence - Particular cases - Motor vehicle accidents - The plaintiff was a front seat passenger in a vehicle owned by the defendant Denis Hall and operated by the defendant Brian Hall - The plaintiff was seriously injured when the vehicle left the roadway and struck a telephone pole - He sued for damages - The defendants asserted that the plaintiff should bear some responsibility for his injuries due to his failure to wear a seatbelt - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, rejected the assertion - The defendants had not provided sufficient evidence to prove on a balance of probabilities that the plaintiff was not wearing a seat belt - It was not sufficient to conclude that the plaintiff was not wearing a seat belt simply because he was ejected from the vehicle - To be successful, the defendants also bore the onus of establishing that the injuries would have been less severe had the plaintiff been wearing a properly fastened seat belt - The evidence was clearly insufficient to establish that the plaintiff's injuries would have been less severe had he been wearing a seat belt - The court was unconvinced by the evidence that any failure to wear a seat belt contributed to the injuries actually sustained by the plaintiff - In fact, the evidence satisfied the court that the injuries might have been worse - The defence of contributory negligence had to fail - See paragraphs 61 to 83.
Torts - Topic 6630
Defences - Contributory negligence - Particular cases - Failure to use safety equipment (incl. seat belts) - [See Torts - Topic 6610 ].
Délits civils - Cote 6610
Défenses - Négligence contributive - Cas particuliers - Accidents de véhicule à moteur - [Voir Torts - Topic 6610 ].
Délits civils - Cote 6630
Défenses - Négligence contributive - Cas particulières - Omission d'utiliser l'équipement de sécurité (y compris les ceintures de sécurité) - [Voir Torts - Topic 6630 ].
Évaluation des dommages-intérêts - Cote 54
Blessures et décès - Blessures corporelles - Rate - [Voir Damage Awards - Topic 54 ].
Évaluation des dommages-intérêts - Cote 56
Blessures et décès - Blessures au tronc - Thorax (y compris les poumons et les côtes) - [Voir Damages Awards - Topic 56 ].
Évaluation des dommages-intérêts - Cote 57
Blessures et décès - Blessures au tronc - Épaule - [Voir Damage Awards - Topic 57 ].
Évaluation des dommages-intérêts - Cote 180
Blessures et décès - Blessures au cou - Fracture - [Voir Damage Awards - Topic 180 ].
Évaluation des dommages-intérêts - Cote 491
Blessures et décès - Évaluation des dommages-intérêts généraux - Perte de services utiles - [Voir Damage Awards - Topic 491 ].
Évaluation des dommages-intérêts - Cote 492.1
Blessures et décès - Évaluation des dommages-intérêts généraux - Perte de revenus antérieure au procès - [Voir Damage Awards - Topic 492.1 ].
Évaluation des dommages-intérêts - Cote 493
Blessures et décès - Évaluation des dommages-intérêts généraux - Perte de revenus futurs - [Voir Damage Awards - Topic 493 ].
Cases Noticed:
Placzek v. Green, [2010] O.T.C. Uned. 2952 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 70].
Scott v. Renton et al. (1999), 215 N.B.R.(2d) 263; 551 A.P.R. 263 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 95].
Cleary v. McCluskey (2002), 252 N.B.R.(2d) 10; 658 A.P.R. 10; 2002 NBCA 45, refd to. [para. 97].
Frenette v. Audet (1988), 89 N.B.R.(2d) 306; 226 A.P.R. 306 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 140].
Hall v. Hebert, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 159; 152 N.R. 321; 26 B.C.A.C. 161; 44 W.A.C. 161, refd to. [para. 144].
LeBreton v. LaRocque et al., [2000] N.B.R.(2d) (Supp.) No. 97; 2000 CanLII 20277 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 163].
Mandzuk v. Vieira and Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 650; 89 N.R. 394, refd to. [para. 174].
Jean v. Pêcheries Roger L. ltée et al. (2010), 354 N.B.R.(2d) 300; 913 A.P.R. 300 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 177].
Counsel:
Avocats:
Gordon Good and Luc Roy, for the plaintiff;
Yassin Choukri, Q.C., for the defendants.
This action was heard on November 14-18 and 21-25, 2011, by Léger, J., of the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, Judicial District of Bathurst, who delivered the following judgment on December 7, 2012.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Osmani v. Universal Structural Restorations Ltd.,
...awarded general damages of approximately $100,000 for significant injuries: Coburn v. Nagra and Lomax, 2001 BCSC 234, Guignard v. Hall, 2013 NBQB 7, and Morris (Guardian ad litem of) v. Gentry, 2005 BCSC 670. While these cases do not specifically relate to testicle injuries, they provide a ......
-
Douthwright v. Duffy, (2015) 442 N.B.R.(2d) 261 (TD)
...[para. 106]. Beaulieu v. Gyuraszi (2008), 265 N.S.R.(2d) 327; 848 A.P.R. 327; 2008 NSSC 187, refd to. [para. 114]. Guignard v. Hall (2012), 408 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 1058 A.P.R. 1, 2013 NBQB 7, refd to. [para. Pelletier et al. v. Ouellette et al. (2003), 258 N.B.R.(2d) 218; 676 A.P.R. 218; 2003 Car......
-
Osmani v. Universal Structural Restorations Ltd.,
...awarded general damages of approximately $100,000 for significant injuries: Coburn v. Nagra and Lomax, 2001 BCSC 234, Guignard v. Hall, 2013 NBQB 7, and Morris (Guardian ad litem of) v. Gentry, 2005 BCSC 670. While these cases do not specifically relate to testicle injuries, they provide a ......
-
Douthwright v. Duffy, (2015) 442 N.B.R.(2d) 261 (TD)
...[para. 106]. Beaulieu v. Gyuraszi (2008), 265 N.S.R.(2d) 327; 848 A.P.R. 327; 2008 NSSC 187, refd to. [para. 114]. Guignard v. Hall (2012), 408 N.B.R.(2d) 1; 1058 A.P.R. 1, 2013 NBQB 7, refd to. [para. Pelletier et al. v. Ouellette et al. (2003), 258 N.B.R.(2d) 218; 676 A.P.R. 218; 2003 Car......