Gunston v MacDonald
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Sidnell |
| Citation | 2021 ABQB 1011 |
| Docket Number | 4801 180526 |
| Date | 17 December 2021 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Savoie v. Lambert
...the MPA, depending on the particular circumstances: Jensen v Jensen, 2009 ABCA 272 at para 60; Vestby at para 221; Gunston v MacDonald, 2021 ABQB 1011 at para 52; Hoskins v Hoskins, 2019 ABQB 651 at para 48; Bentley at para [79] Further, an exemption can only apply to matrimonial property t......
-
Jonk v. Mercier
...79; Barkwell CA at para 15; Scheffelmeir v Krassman, 2011 ABCA 64 at para 14; Hogue at para 79; Miller at para 12; Gunston v MacDonald, 2021 ABQB 1011 at para 58; Hamani v Hamani, 2023 ABKB 360 at para 32; Jackson v Jackson, 1989 ABCA 197 at para 11; Gordon v Gordon, 2014 ABQB 596 at para 1......
-
Melendres v. Beatty
...the MPA, depending on the particular circumstances: Jensen v Jensen, 2009 ABCA 272 at para 60; Vestby at para 221; Gunston v MacDonald, 2021 ABQB 1011 at para 52; Hoskins v Hoskins, 2019 ABQB 651 at para 48; Bentley at para [130] For example, in Mancini v Phelan, 2012 ABQB 536 at paras 65-7......
3 cases
-
Savoie v. Lambert
...the MPA, depending on the particular circumstances: Jensen v Jensen, 2009 ABCA 272 at para 60; Vestby at para 221; Gunston v MacDonald, 2021 ABQB 1011 at para 52; Hoskins v Hoskins, 2019 ABQB 651 at para 48; Bentley at para [79] Further, an exemption can only apply to matrimonial property t......
-
Jonk v. Mercier
...79; Barkwell CA at para 15; Scheffelmeir v Krassman, 2011 ABCA 64 at para 14; Hogue at para 79; Miller at para 12; Gunston v MacDonald, 2021 ABQB 1011 at para 58; Hamani v Hamani, 2023 ABKB 360 at para 32; Jackson v Jackson, 1989 ABCA 197 at para 11; Gordon v Gordon, 2014 ABQB 596 at para 1......
-
Melendres v. Beatty
...the MPA, depending on the particular circumstances: Jensen v Jensen, 2009 ABCA 272 at para 60; Vestby at para 221; Gunston v MacDonald, 2021 ABQB 1011 at para 52; Hoskins v Hoskins, 2019 ABQB 651 at para 48; Bentley at para [130] For example, in Mancini v Phelan, 2012 ABQB 536 at paras 65-7......
