Gustafson v. MacFarlane
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Gomery |
| Date | 26 October 2022 |
| Docket Number | S199677 |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 1872 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
MacFarlane v Gustafson
...in her blood pressure. 4 Ms. Gustafson sued Ms. MacFarlane in negligence. 5 The trial judge issued his reasons on October 26, 2022: 2022 BCSC 1872 [Reasons]. With respect to liability, the judge found Ms. MacFarlane 100% negligent, rejecting her claim that Ms. Gustafson had been contributor......
-
Russell v Russell
...multiple surgeries and treatments in the following years. This is not the situation before me. 135 Similarly, in Gustafson v MacFarlane, 2022 BCSC 1872, the Court awarded $435,000 in general damages to a plaintiff who was run over by the defendant's car. She suffered a spinal cord injury, l......
2 cases
-
MacFarlane v Gustafson
...in her blood pressure. 4 Ms. Gustafson sued Ms. MacFarlane in negligence. 5 The trial judge issued his reasons on October 26, 2022: 2022 BCSC 1872 [Reasons]. With respect to liability, the judge found Ms. MacFarlane 100% negligent, rejecting her claim that Ms. Gustafson had been contributor......
-
Russell v Russell
...multiple surgeries and treatments in the following years. This is not the situation before me. 135 Similarly, in Gustafson v MacFarlane, 2022 BCSC 1872, the Court awarded $435,000 in general damages to a plaintiff who was run over by the defendant's car. She suffered a spinal cord injury, l......