H.B. v. A.B., [2014] A.R. Uned. 106 (CA)

JudgeO'Brien, Rowbotham and McDonald, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Citation[2014] A.R. Uned. 106 (CA),2014 ABCA 152,[2014] A.R. Uned. 106
Date02 May 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
23 practice notes
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...governing the concept of “double dipping,” see Boston v Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413 (variation proceeding); see also Alpugan v Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152 (investment portfolio); Jordan v Jordan, 2011 BCCA 518; Graham v Graham, 2018 BCSC 1888; Senek v Senek, 2014 MBCA 67; Kehler v Kehler, 2017 MBQB ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2024
    • Invalid date
    ...BCJ No 2389 (SC).......................................................................................... 113, 325 Alpugan v Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152................................................................................................................429 Alsafouti v Alsafouti, [2005......
  • Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...governing the concept of “double dipping,” see Boston v Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413 (variation proceeding); see also Alpugan v Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152 (investment portfolio); Bone v Bone, 2020 ABCA 323, leave to appeal to SCC denied, 2021 CanLII 10733 Jordan v Jordan, 2011 BCCA 518; Senek v Sene......
  • Effect of order or agreement or other arrangement that benefits child; consent orders
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2020
    • June 23, 2019
    ...v Anderson, 2002 MBCA 166 at para 16; Riddell v Riddell, 2013 MBQB 4. 31 See Boston v Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413. 32 Alpugan v Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152; HB v AB, 2010 ABCA 279. 33 Wang v Wang, [1997] BCJ No 1678 (SC), af’d [1998] BCJ No 1966 (CA); compare Wright v Zaver, [2002] SCJ No 1098 (CA).......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • Warren v. Warren, 2019 ABCA 20
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 21, 2019
    ...would not be the fairest determination of that income and [to] determine an income that is fair and reasonable”. See Alpugan v. Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152, ¶ 23; 45 R.F.L. 7th 1, 10 (stock options “actually received” should be included in the payor’s income); Ewing v. Ewing, 2009 ABCA 227, ¶ 31;......
  • Kawula v Institute of Chartered Accountants of Saskatchewan
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 7, 2017
    ...Diocese of Calgary, 2012 ABCA 390 at para 6, 539 AR 343; R v Alves, 2014 SKCA 82 at para 54, [2014] 12 WWR 63 [Alves]; Alpugan v Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152 at para 20, 45 RFL (7th) 1; and O’Grady v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FCA 221 at para 2. Note also Roger P. Kerans and Kim M. Willey, St......
  • Warren v. Baird, 2015 ABQB 479
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen''s Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 29, 2015
    ...v. Dalla Longa 2008 ABQB 183 and (for the mother): Goulding v. Keck 2014 ABCA 138, Bazian v. Bazian 2014 ABQB 694, Alpugan v. Baykan 2014 ABCA 152 , Roberts v. Roberts 1999 ABQB 944, Marinangeli v. Marinangeli [2003] O.J. 2819, Patterson v. Patterson Ontario Court of Justice (no citation), ......
  • Bone v Bone, 2020 ABCA 323
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 16, 2020
    ...to generate a comfortable income for herself. The chambers judge was right to consider this fact: Boston at para 56; Alpugan v Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152 at para [25] But Ms Bone was not prudent; indeed, she was the exact opposite. This was explained in part by her mental health struggles and by......
  • Get Started for Free
16 books & journal articles
  • Spousal Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...governing the concept of “double dipping,” see Boston v Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413 (variation proceeding); see also Alpugan v Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152 (investment portfolio); Jordan v Jordan, 2011 BCCA 518; Graham v Graham, 2018 BCSC 1888; Senek v Senek, 2014 MBCA 67; Kehler v Kehler, 2017 MBQB ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2024
    • Invalid date
    ...BCJ No 2389 (SC).......................................................................................... 113, 325 Alpugan v Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152................................................................................................................429 Alsafouti v Alsafouti, [2005......
  • Chapter 8: Spousal Support on or After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law (Tenth Edition)
    • April 14, 2025
    ...governing the concept of “double dipping,” see Boston v Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413 (variation proceeding); see also Alpugan v Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152 (investment portfolio); Bone v Bone, 2020 ABCA 323, leave to appeal to SCC denied, 2021 CanLII 10733 Jordan v Jordan, 2011 BCCA 518; Senek v Sene......
  • Effect of order or agreement or other arrangement that benefits child; consent orders
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2020
    • June 23, 2019
    ...v Anderson, 2002 MBCA 166 at para 16; Riddell v Riddell, 2013 MBQB 4. 31 See Boston v Boston, [2001] 2 SCR 413. 32 Alpugan v Baykan, 2014 ABCA 152; HB v AB, 2010 ABCA 279. 33 Wang v Wang, [1997] BCJ No 1678 (SC), af’d [1998] BCJ No 1966 (CA); compare Wright v Zaver, [2002] SCJ No 1098 (CA).......
  • Get Started for Free