E.H. v. O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | S.B. Sherr |
| Citation | 2018 ONCJ 578 |
| Date | 27 August 2018 |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Docket Number | D48590/09 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 practice notes
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 29 November 2, 2018)
...Justice Act, RSO 1990, c C.43, s. 131(1), Family Law Rules, Selznick v Selznick, 2013 ONCA 35, Serra v Serra, 2009 ONCA 395, E.H. v O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578, Sambasivan v Pulendrarajan, 2012 ONCJ 711, Cobb v Long Estate, 2017 ONCA 717, Frick v Frick, 2016 ONCA 799, Berta v Berta, 2015 ONCA 918, ......
-
Mattina v. Mattina, 2018 ONCA 867
...22. Rule 2(2) adds a fourth fundamental purpose: to ensure that cases are dealt with justly: Family Law Rules, r. 2(2); E.H. v. O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578, at para. 8; Sambasivam v. Pulendrarajah, 2012 ONCJ 711, at para. 37. And Rule 24(12)[1], which sets out factors relevant to setting the amount......
-
Tintinalli v. Tutolo,
...Procedure should be approached with some caution.” At para. 10 of Mattina, the Court of Appeal cited, with approval, E.H. v. O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578, in which Scherr J. held at para. 34 that “Costs decisions in family law cases are governed by the Family Law Rules and the jurispru......
-
G.T.C. v. S.M.G., 2020 ONCJ 580
...and mirrored the position that she took at trial. It was served only one day before the start of the trial. [36] In E.O. v. O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578, this court set out that offers to settle served so close to the hearing run the risk of being given little weight in a costs analysis. Parties req......
Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
-
Mattina v. Mattina, 2018 ONCA 867
...22. Rule 2(2) adds a fourth fundamental purpose: to ensure that cases are dealt with justly: Family Law Rules, r. 2(2); E.H. v. O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578, at para. 8; Sambasivam v. Pulendrarajah, 2012 ONCJ 711, at para. 37. And Rule 24(12)[1], which sets out factors relevant to setting the amount......
-
Tintinalli v. Tutolo,
...Procedure should be approached with some caution.” At para. 10 of Mattina, the Court of Appeal cited, with approval, E.H. v. O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578, in which Scherr J. held at para. 34 that “Costs decisions in family law cases are governed by the Family Law Rules and the jurispru......
-
G.T.C. v. S.M.G., 2020 ONCJ 580
...and mirrored the position that she took at trial. It was served only one day before the start of the trial. [36] In E.O. v. O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578, this court set out that offers to settle served so close to the hearing run the risk of being given little weight in a costs analysis. Parties req......
-
Liu v. Huang, 2018 ONSC 7441
...22. Rule 2(2) adds a fourth fundamental purpose: to ensure that cases are dealt with justly: Family Law Rules, r. 2(2); E.H. v. O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578 (CanLII), at para. 8; Sambasivam v. Pulendrarajah, 2012 ONCJ 711(CanLII), at para. 37. And Rule 24(12)[1], which sets out factors relevant to s......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 29 November 2, 2018)
...Justice Act, RSO 1990, c C.43, s. 131(1), Family Law Rules, Selznick v Selznick, 2013 ONCA 35, Serra v Serra, 2009 ONCA 395, E.H. v O.K., 2018 ONCJ 578, Sambasivan v Pulendrarajan, 2012 ONCJ 711, Cobb v Long Estate, 2017 ONCA 717, Frick v Frick, 2016 ONCA 799, Berta v Berta, 2015 ONCA 918, ......