Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice A. Woolley |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABQB 82 |
| Citation | 2021 ABQB 82 |
| Date | 02 February 2021 |
| Docket Number | 1001 18586 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
18 practice notes
-
McDonald v Sproule Management GP Limited
...and the plaintiff having the burden to prove condonation of misconduct by the employer: Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc, 2021 ABQB 82 at para 110; Rudichuk v Genesis Land Development Corp, 2019 ABQB 133 [Rudichuk QB] at paras 37-40, affirmed 2020 ABCA 42 [Rudichuk [56] Accordi......
-
Stonham v Recycling Worx Inc
...Canada Limited, 2015 ABQB 563 at para 30. The onus is on the employer to prove just cause: [Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc, 2021 ABQB 82] at para 110; Whitford v Agrium Inc, 2006 ABQB 726 ... at para [64] A finding of misconduct does not, in and of itself, give rise to just c......
-
Singh v. Clark Builders
...at para 29. [138] This contextual approach was confirmed in Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc, 2021 ABQB 82: [408] An employer need not continue an employee’s employment indefinitely. And, of course, an employee need no......
-
K.R. v. J.R.
...witnessed, and require inferences to be drawn in order to connect them to the claimant. As Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc., 2021 ABQB 82 112 Evidence supporting a claim may be direct or circumstantial; it may on its own support the conclusion that the event occurred (re wheth......
Get Started for Free
15 cases
-
McDonald v Sproule Management GP Limited
...and the plaintiff having the burden to prove condonation of misconduct by the employer: Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc, 2021 ABQB 82 at para 110; Rudichuk v Genesis Land Development Corp, 2019 ABQB 133 [Rudichuk QB] at paras 37-40, affirmed 2020 ABCA 42 [Rudichuk [56] Accordi......
-
Stonham v Recycling Worx Inc
...Canada Limited, 2015 ABQB 563 at para 30. The onus is on the employer to prove just cause: [Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc, 2021 ABQB 82] at para 110; Whitford v Agrium Inc, 2006 ABQB 726 ... at para [64] A finding of misconduct does not, in and of itself, give rise to just c......
-
Singh v. Clark Builders
...at para 29. [138] This contextual approach was confirmed in Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc, 2021 ABQB 82: [408] An employer need not continue an employee’s employment indefinitely. And, of course, an employee need no......
-
K.R. v. J.R.
...witnessed, and require inferences to be drawn in order to connect them to the claimant. As Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc., 2021 ABQB 82 112 Evidence supporting a claim may be direct or circumstantial; it may on its own support the conclusion that the event occurred (re wheth......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
New Developments On The Oppression Remedy And Bad Faith
...Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc., 2021 ABQB 82 The duty of honest contractual performance and the oppression remedy are two key risk areas facing businesses, particularly closely held corporations. The decisions in Haack v. Secure Energy (Drilling) Inc. 2021 ABQB 82, and 2021 ABQB 342......
-
In Good Faith: Seven Cases Impacting Your Contracts
...purposes and did not violate the duty to act in good faith. The Employment Law Context: Haack v. Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc., 2021 ABQB 82 In Haack, the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench confirmed that the duty of good faith and honest performance focuses on honesty and whether a co......
1 books & journal articles
-
2021 Employment Law Alberta Year in Review.
...entitlement to the bonuses, so the employer had to pay them. Just Cause for Dismissal Haack v Secure Energy (Drilling Services) Inc, 2021 ABQB 82 dealt with just cause for summary dismissal. The case provides an excellent summary of the law of just cause in Alberta, affirming the high bar a......
