Haastrup v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 141

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2020 FC 141
Date27 January 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 practice notes
  • Fashola v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1671
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 11 Diciembre 2023
    ...issues if he relocates now. This finding was also reasonable. [52] The Applicant cites Haastrup v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 141 [Haastrup], where Justice Kane overturned an RPD decision, finding it had failed to reconcile relevant evidence about the applicants’ pa......
  • Agbeja v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 781
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 30 Julio 2020
    ...proper legal test for an IFA. Justice Kane explained the IFA analysis instructively in Haastrup v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 141 [Haastrup]: [29] As explained in Ranganathan [v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2001] 2 FC 164 (CA)] and in the jurisprude......
  • Olori v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 26 Noviembre 2021
    ...from family, difficulty to find work, and a reduction in the quality of life” (Haastrup v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 141 at para 30; Ade-Ogunade at paras 27-28). I do not find that the Applicants have met this threshold. VIII. [41] I would dismiss the application f......
  • Kuka v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 209
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 8 Febrero 2024
    ...the language of internal relocation in the country—that was speculative (Haastrup v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 141 at para 27, citing Thirunavukkarasu v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), 1993 CanLII 3011 (FCA) [Thirunavukkarasu]). The Officer also f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
  • Fashola v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1671
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 11 Diciembre 2023
    ...issues if he relocates now. This finding was also reasonable. [52] The Applicant cites Haastrup v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 141 [Haastrup], where Justice Kane overturned an RPD decision, finding it had failed to reconcile relevant evidence about the applicants’ pa......
  • Agbeja v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 781
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 30 Julio 2020
    ...proper legal test for an IFA. Justice Kane explained the IFA analysis instructively in Haastrup v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 141 [Haastrup]: [29] As explained in Ranganathan [v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2001] 2 FC 164 (CA)] and in the jurisprude......
  • Olori v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 26 Noviembre 2021
    ...from family, difficulty to find work, and a reduction in the quality of life” (Haastrup v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 141 at para 30; Ade-Ogunade at paras 27-28). I do not find that the Applicants have met this threshold. VIII. [41] I would dismiss the application f......
  • Kuka v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 209
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 8 Febrero 2024
    ...the language of internal relocation in the country—that was speculative (Haastrup v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 141 at para 27, citing Thirunavukkarasu v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), 1993 CanLII 3011 (FCA) [Thirunavukkarasu]). The Officer also f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT