Hamid v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 145 |
| Date | 28 January 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Adeleye v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 81
...credible. Relying on Nimako v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 540 [Nimako] and Hamid v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145 [Hamid], Ms. Adeleye argues that the RAD can only analyze the motivation of an applicant’s agents of persecution when his/her testimony is f......
-
Oluwo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 760
...despite the fact they bore the burden to demonstrate how a proposed IFA is unreasonable (Hamid v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145 at para 53). [43] In effect, the Applicants are faulting the RAD for failing to address an issue that they did not raise before it. As general r......
-
Iribhogbe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 501
...not the RAD (Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 810 at para 58; Hamid v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145 at para 56). [39] Moreover, the Applicant had to show that it was objectively unreasonable for him to move to the proposed IFA locations. The RAD cons......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...was put before the RAD. [58] It is not up to the RAD to make the case for the applicants: Hamid v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145 at para 56. VIII. [59] For all the foregoing reasons, I find the applicants have not shown that the RAD erred in any respect. [60] The applicat......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Adeleye v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 81
...credible. Relying on Nimako v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 540 [Nimako] and Hamid v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145 [Hamid], Ms. Adeleye argues that the RAD can only analyze the motivation of an applicant’s agents of persecution when his/her testimony is f......
-
Oluwo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 760
...despite the fact they bore the burden to demonstrate how a proposed IFA is unreasonable (Hamid v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145 at para 53). [43] In effect, the Applicants are faulting the RAD for failing to address an issue that they did not raise before it. As general r......
-
Iribhogbe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 501
...not the RAD (Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 810 at para 58; Hamid v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145 at para 56). [39] Moreover, the Applicant had to show that it was objectively unreasonable for him to move to the proposed IFA locations. The RAD cons......
-
Singh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...was put before the RAD. [58] It is not up to the RAD to make the case for the applicants: Hamid v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 145 at para 56. VIII. [59] For all the foregoing reasons, I find the applicants have not shown that the RAD erred in any respect. [60] The applicat......
Request a trial to view additional results