Hamilton v. Popp, 2014 BCSC 506

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeWeatherill, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterFAMILY LAW
Citation2014 BCSC 506,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 506,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 506 (SC)
Date26 March 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Goundrey-Beskau v. Beskau, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 168 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 10 Febrero 2015
    ...178, Tindle v. Tindle , 2012 BCSC 604, Marsland v. Gibb , 2000 BCSC 471, Karhoffer v. Karhoffer , 2002 BCSC 1570 and Hamilton v. Popp , 2014 BCSC 506. The authorities frequently note that family cases of this sort are fact driven and fact specific. Apart from statements of principle, cases ......
  • Mohamed v. Martone, 2019 BCSC 38
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 15 Enero 2019
    ...this case. [41] In determining the child support payable, I find guidance in the decision of Mr. Justice Weatherill in Hamilton v. Popp, 2014 BCSC 506 [Hamilton]. In that case, the payor of child support for a child of the marriage, who lived in B.C. and was attending university in Nova Sco......
  • Evans v. Evans, 2019 BCSC 294
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 7 Marzo 2019
    ...Under s. 3(2)(b), the Court has a broad discretion to determine what order is fair and just in all the circumstances: Hamilton v. Popp, 2014 BCSC 506 at para. 35; Hausmann at para. [80] The leading authority with respect to the issue of retroactive child support is the decision of the Supre......
  • L.F. v. R.B., 2021 BCSC 464
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 15 Marzo 2021
    ...contribute to the support of the child, as well as the child’s contribution. [55] Further referring to the reasoning in Hamilton v. Popp, 2014 BCSC 506 and H.M.K. v. B.P.K., 2012 BCSC 435, particularly regarding the duplication of efforts where the parties have contributed to RESPs for the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Goundrey-Beskau v. Beskau, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 168 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 10 Febrero 2015
    ...178, Tindle v. Tindle , 2012 BCSC 604, Marsland v. Gibb , 2000 BCSC 471, Karhoffer v. Karhoffer , 2002 BCSC 1570 and Hamilton v. Popp , 2014 BCSC 506. The authorities frequently note that family cases of this sort are fact driven and fact specific. Apart from statements of principle, cases ......
  • Mohamed v. Martone, 2019 BCSC 38
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 15 Enero 2019
    ...this case. [41] In determining the child support payable, I find guidance in the decision of Mr. Justice Weatherill in Hamilton v. Popp, 2014 BCSC 506 [Hamilton]. In that case, the payor of child support for a child of the marriage, who lived in B.C. and was attending university in Nova Sco......
  • Evans v. Evans, 2019 BCSC 294
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 7 Marzo 2019
    ...Under s. 3(2)(b), the Court has a broad discretion to determine what order is fair and just in all the circumstances: Hamilton v. Popp, 2014 BCSC 506 at para. 35; Hausmann at para. [80] The leading authority with respect to the issue of retroactive child support is the decision of the Supre......
  • L.F. v. R.B.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 15 Marzo 2021
    ...contribute to the support of the child, as well as the child’s contribution. [55] Further referring to the reasoning in Hamilton v. Popp, 2014 BCSC 506 and H.M.K. v. B.P.K., 2012 BCSC 435, particularly regarding the duplication of efforts where the parties have contributed to RESPs for the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT