Handley v. Handley, 2005 BCSC 129

CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 25, 2005
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2005 BCSC 129;[2005] B.C.T.C. 129 (SCM)

Handley v. Handley, [2005] B.C.T.C. 129 (SCM)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. MR.027

Donald Lawrence Handley, a person under disability, by his Litigation Guardian, Lorna Sadler (plaintiff) v. Melba Margaret Eva Handley (defendant)

(E32311; 2005 BCSC 129)

Indexed As: Handley v. Handley

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vernon

Hyslop, Master

February 1, 2005.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Family Law - Topic 948.2

Husband and wife - Marital property - Distribution orders - Practice - Interim distribution or borrowing against - See paragraphs 1 to 10.

Cases Noticed:

Ciachurski v. Ciachurski (1994), 47 B.C.A.C. 208; 76 W.A.C. 208 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 5].

Walji v. Walji Estate, [1994] B.C.J. No. 1982 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 6].

Jiwa v. Jiwa, [1992] B.C.J. No. 3024 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 6].

Erskine v. Erskine (1991), 31 R.F.L.(3d) 273 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 7].

Ansari v. Ansari, [2000] B.C.T.C. Uned. 177 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 8].

Hiemstra v. Hiemstra et al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 261 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 9].

Counsel:

G.W. Wagner, for the plaintiff;

D.C. Higham, for the defendant.

This application was heard on January 25, 2005, before Hyslop, Master, of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on February 1, 2005.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Prystay v. Prystay, 2006 BCSC 495
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 28, 2006
    ...v. Hiemstra , 2001 BCSC 261 at para. 5; Ansari v. Ansari , 2000 BCSC 634 at paras. 21-28; Handley (Litigation Guardian) v. Handley , 2005 BCSC 129; and, Pierce v. Pierce (1994), 2 B.C.L.R. (3d) 31 (S.C.)). [16] The situation in the case at bar can be distinguished from these authorities. Th......
1 cases
  • Prystay v. Prystay, 2006 BCSC 495
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 28, 2006
    ...v. Hiemstra , 2001 BCSC 261 at para. 5; Ansari v. Ansari , 2000 BCSC 634 at paras. 21-28; Handley (Litigation Guardian) v. Handley , 2005 BCSC 129; and, Pierce v. Pierce (1994), 2 B.C.L.R. (3d) 31 (S.C.)). [16] The situation in the case at bar can be distinguished from these authorities. Th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT