Handley v. Handley, 2005 BCSC 129
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Case Date | January 25, 2005 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | 2005 BCSC 129;[2005] B.C.T.C. 129 (SCM) |
Handley v. Handley, [2005] B.C.T.C. 129 (SCM)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2005] B.C.T.C. TBEd. MR.027
Donald Lawrence Handley, a person under disability, by his Litigation Guardian, Lorna Sadler (plaintiff) v. Melba Margaret Eva Handley (defendant)
(E32311; 2005 BCSC 129)
Indexed As: Handley v. Handley
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vernon
Hyslop, Master
February 1, 2005.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Family Law - Topic 948.2
Husband and wife - Marital property - Distribution orders - Practice - Interim distribution or borrowing against - See paragraphs 1 to 10.
Cases Noticed:
Ciachurski v. Ciachurski (1994), 47 B.C.A.C. 208; 76 W.A.C. 208 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 5].
Walji v. Walji Estate, [1994] B.C.J. No. 1982 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 6].
Jiwa v. Jiwa, [1992] B.C.J. No. 3024 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 6].
Erskine v. Erskine (1991), 31 R.F.L.(3d) 273 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 7].
Ansari v. Ansari, [2000] B.C.T.C. Uned. 177 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 8].
Hiemstra v. Hiemstra et al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 261 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 9].
Counsel:
G.W. Wagner, for the plaintiff;
D.C. Higham, for the defendant.
This application was heard on January 25, 2005, before Hyslop, Master, of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on February 1, 2005.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Prystay v. Prystay, 2006 BCSC 495
...v. Hiemstra , 2001 BCSC 261 at para. 5; Ansari v. Ansari , 2000 BCSC 634 at paras. 21-28; Handley (Litigation Guardian) v. Handley , 2005 BCSC 129; and, Pierce v. Pierce (1994), 2 B.C.L.R. (3d) 31 (S.C.)). [16] The situation in the case at bar can be distinguished from these authorities. Th......
-
Prystay v. Prystay, 2006 BCSC 495
...v. Hiemstra , 2001 BCSC 261 at para. 5; Ansari v. Ansari , 2000 BCSC 634 at paras. 21-28; Handley (Litigation Guardian) v. Handley , 2005 BCSC 129; and, Pierce v. Pierce (1994), 2 B.C.L.R. (3d) 31 (S.C.)). [16] The situation in the case at bar can be distinguished from these authorities. Th......