Haq v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2016] F.T.R. Uned. 98

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeGleeson, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation[2016] F.T.R. Uned. 98,[2016] F.T.R. Uned. 98 (FC),2016 FC 370
Date01 April 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • Balepo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 5 Diciembre 2017
    ...ties were sufficient to compel his return to Nigeria. The Respondent says, in view of Haq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 370, 264 AWCS (3d) 1006, that in the absence of express or implied findings by the Court or specific directions to the decision-maker on redetermination,......
  • Mohamed v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 2 Junio 2016
    ...v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2007 FCA 385 at paras 12-13 [ Raza ]; Haq v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2016 FC 370 at para 16 ; Escalona Perez v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2006 FC 1379 at para 5 [ Escalona Perez ]). As stated by the F......
  • Hong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 13 Octubre 2017
    ...where the matter is settled by case-law, and that is the situation here (see Haq v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 370, at para 15; Nguyen v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 59, at para 4). The decisions of this Court make clear that the st......
  • Mbula-Kolela v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 24 Febrero 2020
    ...65; Nwabueze v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 323 at para 7, citing Haq v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 370 at para 15 and Nguyen v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 59 at para 4). [10] In addition to the requirements of s. ......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • Balepo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1104
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 5 Diciembre 2017
    ...ties were sufficient to compel his return to Nigeria. The Respondent says, in view of Haq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 370, 264 AWCS (3d) 1006, that in the absence of express or implied findings by the Court or specific directions to the decision-maker on redetermination,......
  • Mohamed v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 619
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 2 Junio 2016
    ...v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2007 FCA 385 at paras 12-13 [ Raza ]; Haq v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2016 FC 370 at para 16 ; Escalona Perez v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2006 FC 1379 at para 5 [ Escalona Perez ]). As stated by the F......
  • Hong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 913
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 13 Octubre 2017
    ...where the matter is settled by case-law, and that is the situation here (see Haq v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 370, at para 15; Nguyen v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 59, at para 4). The decisions of this Court make clear that the st......
  • Mbula-Kolela v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 260
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 24 Febrero 2020
    ...65; Nwabueze v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 323 at para 7, citing Haq v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 370 at para 15 and Nguyen v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 59 at para 4). [10] In addition to the requirements of s. ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT