Harbaugh v Harbaugh, 2020 ABCA 280
Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Ritu Khullar,The Honourable Madam Justice Elizabeth Hughes,The Honourable Madam Justice Jolaine Antonio |
Docket Number | 1801-0375-AC |
Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
Date | 27 July 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...4298 (Div Ct), citing SP v RP, 2011 ONCA 336 at para 59; Punzo v Punzo, 2016 ONCA 957; AG v JG, 2021 SKQB 101. See Harbaugh v Harbaugh, 2020 ABCA 280; Hallgren v Fry, 2013 BCCA 15; McKenzie v Perestrelo, 2014 BCCA 161 at paras 105–106; Ducharme v Rempel, 2016 BCCA 198; PW v GZ, 2021 BCSC 46......
-
Kuzuchar v Kuzuchar,
...of the matrimonial property: Hamani v Hamani, 2022 ABQB 441 at para 56; Harbaugh v Harbaugh, 2018 ABQB 922 at para 76, affirmed 2020 ABCA 280. [135] Rarely, if ever, should a spouse be allowed to bank a claim for occupation rent and present that cla......
-
Kelly v Gammon,
...$20,000/$30,000), as well as Hanson v Hanson, 2016 ABCA 26 (para 19); Harbaugh v Harbaugh, 2018 ABQB 922 (Horner J.) at para 59 (affirmed 2020 ABCA 280); Maitland v Maitland, 2005 CanLII 19768 (ONSC) (Pardu J.) at paras 19-22; Sosnowski v Sosnowski, 2002 BCSC 306 (Melnick J.) at paras 41-43......
-
JRL v TRL,
...unless it would not be just and equitable to do so considering the s. 8 factors. Equality is the default position: MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 280, and there must be a “real imbalance” in the parties’ respective contributions to rebut that presumption: Mazurenko v ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Kuzuchar v Kuzuchar,
...of the matrimonial property: Hamani v Hamani, 2022 ABQB 441 at para 56; Harbaugh v Harbaugh, 2018 ABQB 922 at para 76, affirmed 2020 ABCA 280. [135] Rarely, if ever, should a spouse be allowed to bank a claim for occupation rent and present that cla......
-
Kelly v Gammon,
...$20,000/$30,000), as well as Hanson v Hanson, 2016 ABCA 26 (para 19); Harbaugh v Harbaugh, 2018 ABQB 922 (Horner J.) at para 59 (affirmed 2020 ABCA 280); Maitland v Maitland, 2005 CanLII 19768 (ONSC) (Pardu J.) at paras 19-22; Sosnowski v Sosnowski, 2002 BCSC 306 (Melnick J.) at paras 41-43......
-
JRL v TRL,
...unless it would not be just and equitable to do so considering the s. 8 factors. Equality is the default position: MAK v TJK, 2020 ABCA 280, and there must be a “real imbalance” in the parties’ respective contributions to rebut that presumption: Mazurenko v ......
-
Gudiel Alecio v Ropson,
...any contribution by the other party: Matrimonial Property Act, s. 8(c) and Harbaugh v Harbaugh, 2018 ABQB 922 at para 81 – 86 affd 2020 ABCA 280 at para 48 – [24] The present value of the portion of Mr. Ropson’s CLAC pension whi......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...4298 (Div Ct), citing SP v RP, 2011 ONCA 336 at para 59; Punzo v Punzo, 2016 ONCA 957; AG v JG, 2021 SKQB 101. See Harbaugh v Harbaugh, 2020 ABCA 280; Hallgren v Fry, 2013 BCCA 15; McKenzie v Perestrelo, 2014 BCCA 161 at paras 105–106; Ducharme v Rempel, 2016 BCCA 198; PW v GZ, 2021 BCSC 46......