Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | Schwann, Barrington-Foote and Tholl JJ.A. |
Citation | 2020 SKCA 98 |
Docket Number | CACV3520 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
Date | 12 August 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 practice notes
-
Slater v Pedigree Poultry Ltd.,
...of evidence. See: Rieger v Burgess, [1988] 4 WWR 577 (Sask CA). To similar effect, see Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 29, and Rieger v Burgess (1988), 66 Sask R 1 (CA) at para 55. [239] The appellants......
-
Bhagaloo v M2 Construction & Development Ltd.,
...A judge is not permitted to consider affidavit or other extraneous evidence. See also Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 [Harpold], and Reisinger v J.C. Akin Architects Ltd., 2017 SKCA 11, 411 DLR (4th) 687 [Reisinger]. [25] ......
-
Harsch v Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
...v Merchant Law Group LLP, 2017 SKCA 62 at para 17, [2017] 10 WWR 664 [Merchant]; Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 21 [Harpold]; and Taheri v Buhr, 2021 SKCA 9 at para 23, 456 DLR (4th) 306 [Taheri]). Striking pleadings under Rule 7-9(2)(a) [17] ......
-
Yashcheshen v Canada (Attorney General),
...Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237; and Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 21 [74] As I will explain, I need only address the first aspect in order to resolve this appeal......
Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
-
Slater v Pedigree Poultry Ltd.,
...of evidence. See: Rieger v Burgess, [1988] 4 WWR 577 (Sask CA). To similar effect, see Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 29, and Rieger v Burgess (1988), 66 Sask R 1 (CA) at para 55. [239] The appellants......
-
Bhagaloo v M2 Construction & Development Ltd.,
...A judge is not permitted to consider affidavit or other extraneous evidence. See also Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 [Harpold], and Reisinger v J.C. Akin Architects Ltd., 2017 SKCA 11, 411 DLR (4th) 687 [Reisinger]. [25] ......
-
Harsch v Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
...v Merchant Law Group LLP, 2017 SKCA 62 at para 17, [2017] 10 WWR 664 [Merchant]; Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 21 [Harpold]; and Taheri v Buhr, 2021 SKCA 9 at para 23, 456 DLR (4th) 306 [Taheri]). Striking pleadings under Rule 7-9(2)(a) [17] ......
-
Yashcheshen v Canada (Attorney General),
...Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237; and Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 21 [74] As I will explain, I need only address the first aspect in order to resolve this appeal......
Request a trial to view additional results