Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeSchwann, Barrington-Foote and Tholl JJ.A.
Citation2020 SKCA 98
Docket NumberCACV3520
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date12 August 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
18 practice notes
  • Slater v Pedigree Poultry Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 7, 2022
    ...of evidence. See: Rieger v Burgess, [1988] 4 WWR 577 (Sask CA). To similar effect, see Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 29, and Rieger v Burgess (1988), 66 Sask R 1 (CA) at para 55. [239]       The appellants......
  • Bhagaloo v M2 Construction & Development Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 22, 2021
    ...A judge is not permitted to consider affidavit or other extraneous evidence. See also Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 [Harpold], and Reisinger v J.C. Akin Architects Ltd., 2017 SKCA 11, 411 DLR (4th) 687 [Reisinger]. [25]      &#......
  • Harsch v Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 2, 2021
    ...v Merchant Law Group LLP, 2017 SKCA 62 at para 17, [2017] 10 WWR 664 [Merchant]; Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 21 [Harpold]; and Taheri v Buhr, 2021 SKCA 9 at para 23, 456 DLR (4th) 306 [Taheri]). Striking pleadings under Rule 7-9(2)(a) [17] &#......
  • Yashcheshen v Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 31, 2021
    ...Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237; and Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 21 [74]        As I will explain, I need only address the first aspect in order to resolve this appeal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
  • Slater v Pedigree Poultry Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 7, 2022
    ...of evidence. See: Rieger v Burgess, [1988] 4 WWR 577 (Sask CA). To similar effect, see Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 29, and Rieger v Burgess (1988), 66 Sask R 1 (CA) at para 55. [239]       The appellants......
  • Bhagaloo v M2 Construction & Development Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 22, 2021
    ...A judge is not permitted to consider affidavit or other extraneous evidence. See also Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 [Harpold], and Reisinger v J.C. Akin Architects Ltd., 2017 SKCA 11, 411 DLR (4th) 687 [Reisinger]. [25]      &#......
  • Harsch v Saskatchewan Government Insurance,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 2, 2021
    ...v Merchant Law Group LLP, 2017 SKCA 62 at para 17, [2017] 10 WWR 664 [Merchant]; Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 21 [Harpold]; and Taheri v Buhr, 2021 SKCA 9 at para 23, 456 DLR (4th) 306 [Taheri]). Striking pleadings under Rule 7-9(2)(a) [17] &#......
  • Yashcheshen v Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 31, 2021
    ...Feng v Saskatchewan (Economy), 2020 SKCA 6 at para 43, 70 Admin LR (6th) 237; and Harpold v Saskatchewan (Corrections and Policing), 2020 SKCA 98 at para 21 [74]        As I will explain, I need only address the first aspect in order to resolve this appeal......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT