Harris v. Durling et al., [2016] N.S.R.(2d) Uned. 12
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Judge | Muise, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,COURTS,FAMILY LAW |
| Citation | [2016] N.S.R.(2d) Uned. 12,2016 NSSC 19,[2016] N.S.R.(2d) Uned. 12 (SC) |
| Date | 22 January 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Chisholm v. Chisholm, 2016 NSSC 325
...the practice is to apply Tariff C to chambers applications and Tariff A to trials and court applications. (See Harris v. Durling and Weir, 2016 NSSC 19). 34. The end goal of costs awards is to do justice between the parties. The quantum of costs awards should not depend on whether Tariff A ......
-
Lake v. Lake, [2016] N.S.R.(2d) Uned. 152
...practice is to apply Tariff C to chambers applications and Tariff A to trials and court applications. (See Harris v. Durling and Weir , 2016 NSSC 19) [34] The end goal of costs awards is to do justice between the parties. The quantum of costs awards should not depend on whether Tariff A or ......
2 cases
-
Chisholm v. Chisholm, 2016 NSSC 325
...the practice is to apply Tariff C to chambers applications and Tariff A to trials and court applications. (See Harris v. Durling and Weir, 2016 NSSC 19). 34. The end goal of costs awards is to do justice between the parties. The quantum of costs awards should not depend on whether Tariff A ......
-
Lake v. Lake, [2016] N.S.R.(2d) Uned. 152
...practice is to apply Tariff C to chambers applications and Tariff A to trials and court applications. (See Harris v. Durling and Weir , 2016 NSSC 19) [34] The end goal of costs awards is to do justice between the parties. The quantum of costs awards should not depend on whether Tariff A or ......