Harte-Eichmanis v. Fernandes,

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Citation[2012] O.A.C. Uned. 229,2012 ONCA 266,[2012] O.A.C. Uned. 229 (CA)
Date26 April 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25-28, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 2, 2021
    ...Commission, 2021 ONCA 358 Keywords: Intellectual Property, Copyright, Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Harte-Eichmanis v. Fernandes, 2012 ONCA 266 CIVIL DECISIONS Mazhar v Farooqi, 2021 ONCA 355 [Juriansz, van Rensburg and Sossin JJ.A.] Counsel: M. M, acting in person N. R. Hasan and C. D......
  • Pullano v. Hinder,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 13, 2021
    ...Divisional Court with jurisdiction over the appeal. He directed the court to the Court of Appeal decision Harte-Eichmanis v. Fernandes, 2012 ONCA 266, 16 R.F.L.(7th) 1. That decision involved an appeal from a judgment following a jury trial in motor vehicle litigation on the issue of damage......
  • Saleh v. Nebel,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 16, 2016
    ...19(1.2) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. C.43 (“CJA”). See CJA, s. 19(1.2)(d); Harte-Eichmanis v. Fernandes, 2012 ONCA 266; McGrath v. Woodrow (2001), 52 O.R. (3d) 732 (C.A.); Sandu v. Fairmont Hotels Inc., 2015 ONCA 611. Further, on the authority of this court......
  • Walcott v. Toronto Transit Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • May 28, 2021
    ...quantified is under $50,000, contrary to s. 6(1)(b) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43: see Harte-Eichmanis v. Fernandes, 2012 ONCA 266, 15 R.F.L. (7th) 1, at paras. [3]           The appellant approached the Toronto Transit ......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • Pullano v. Hinder,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 13, 2021
    ...Divisional Court with jurisdiction over the appeal. He directed the court to the Court of Appeal decision Harte-Eichmanis v. Fernandes, 2012 ONCA 266, 16 R.F.L.(7th) 1. That decision involved an appeal from a judgment following a jury trial in motor vehicle litigation on the issue of damage......
  • Saleh v. Nebel,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 16, 2016
    ...19(1.2) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990 c. C.43 (“CJA”). See CJA, s. 19(1.2)(d); Harte-Eichmanis v. Fernandes, 2012 ONCA 266; McGrath v. Woodrow (2001), 52 O.R. (3d) 732 (C.A.); Sandu v. Fairmont Hotels Inc., 2015 ONCA 611. Further, on the authority of this court......
  • Walcott v. Toronto Transit Commission,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • May 28, 2021
    ...quantified is under $50,000, contrary to s. 6(1)(b) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43: see Harte-Eichmanis v. Fernandes, 2012 ONCA 266, 15 R.F.L. (7th) 1, at paras. [3]           The appellant approached the Toronto Transit ......
  • Jones Feed Mills v. Raivio,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 5, 2017
    ...is determined by the damages awarded or fixed by the trial judge, not the amount claimed. See Harte-Eichmanis v. Fernandes, 2012 ONCA 266 at para. 14. This appeal was started in the Court of Appeal but transferred to this court by consent order of Gillese, J.A. on December 4, B. &......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 25-28, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 2, 2021
    ...Commission, 2021 ONCA 358 Keywords: Intellectual Property, Copyright, Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Harte-Eichmanis v. Fernandes, 2012 ONCA 266 CIVIL DECISIONS Mazhar v Farooqi, 2021 ONCA 355 [Juriansz, van Rensburg and Sossin JJ.A.] Counsel: M. M, acting in person N. R. Hasan and C. D......