Harter v. Longhorn Ventures Inc., [2013] A.R. Uned. 549
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Citation | [2013] A.R. Uned. 549,2013 ABQB 491,[2013] A.R. Uned. 549 (QBM) |
| Date | 28 August 2013 |
| Subject Matter | DAMAGES,SALE OF LAND,CONTRACTS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
1182054 B.C. Ltd. v. Penny
...can be impugned and there was no inequality in bargaining power: Wilkie at paras. 63–66; Harter v. Longhorn Ventures Inc., 2013 ABQB 491; Tang v. Zhang, 2013 BCCA 52, Liu; Redstone; Dar v. The Yards Corporation, 2018 ONSC 5043, aff’d 2019 ONCA 362; and Nawara v. Riverston......
-
La Caille North Point Inc. v 2160806 Alberta Ltd and Harmandeep Arora
...than liquidated damages and b) whether it would be unconscionable for the vendor to retain the funds: Harter v Longhorn Ventures Inc, 2013 ABQB 491 at paras 24–25; Bowlen at para 188 The first inquiry is whether the deposits are a genuine pre-estimate of damages or a penalty. A court review......
2 cases
-
1182054 B.C. Ltd. v. Penny
...can be impugned and there was no inequality in bargaining power: Wilkie at paras. 63–66; Harter v. Longhorn Ventures Inc., 2013 ABQB 491; Tang v. Zhang, 2013 BCCA 52, Liu; Redstone; Dar v. The Yards Corporation, 2018 ONSC 5043, aff’d 2019 ONCA 362; and Nawara v. Riverston......
-
La Caille North Point Inc. v 2160806 Alberta Ltd and Harmandeep Arora
...than liquidated damages and b) whether it would be unconscionable for the vendor to retain the funds: Harter v Longhorn Ventures Inc, 2013 ABQB 491 at paras 24–25; Bowlen at para 188 The first inquiry is whether the deposits are a genuine pre-estimate of damages or a penalty. A court review......