Haudenosaunee Development Institute v. Metrolinx

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeBenotto,MacPherson,van Rensburg
Citation2023 ONCA 144
Date01 March 2023
Docket NumberM54052; M54053; M54054; COA-23-CV-0139

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Leginj v. Rahman
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 27, 2025
    ...[21] The Court of Appeal has confirmed this test numerous times. See, for example, Haudenosaunee Development Institute v. Metrolinx, 2023 ONCA 144, at paras. 33 and An interlocutory order is an order which “does not determine the real matter in dispute between the parties – the very subject......
  • Bradu et al. v. Romanian Cultural Association (Hamilton) Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • March 30, 2026
    ...has confirmed this test numerous times and cites as an example the Court’s decision in Haudenosaunee Development Institute v. Metrolinx, 2023 ONCA 144, where at paras. 33 and 40, the Court states: An interlocutory order is an order which “does not determine the real matter in dispute betwee......
2 cases
  • Leginj v Rahman
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 27, 2025
    ...21 The Court of Appeal has confirmed this test numerous times. See, for example, Haudenosaunee Development Institute v. Metrolinx, 2023 ONCA 144, at paras. 33 and 40: An interlocutory order is an order which “does not determine the real matter in dispute between the parties – the very subje......
  • Haudenosaunee Development Institute v Metrolinx
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • March 1, 2023
    ...Party (Appellant/Moving Party/Responding Party) and Metrolinx Respondent/Responding Party (Respondent/Responding Party/Moving Party) 2023 ONCA 144 MacPherson, van Rensburg and Benotto JJ.A. DOCKET: M54052, M54053 & M54054 (COA-23-CV-0139) COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Tim Gilbert, Colin C......