Haudenosaunee Development Institute v. Metrolinx,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeBenotto,MacPherson,van Rensburg
Citation2023 ONCA 144
Docket NumberM54052; M54053; M54054; COA-23-CV-0139
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date01 March 2023

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Leginj v Rahman,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 27, 2025
    ...21 The Court of Appeal has confirmed this test numerous times. See, for example, Haudenosaunee Development Institute v. Metrolinx, 2023 ONCA 144, at paras. 33 and 40: An interlocutory order is an order which “does not determine the real matter in dispute between the parties – the very subje......
  • Haudenosaunee Development Institute v Metrolinx,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • March 1, 2023
    ...Party (Appellant/Moving Party/Responding Party) and Metrolinx Respondent/Responding Party (Respondent/Responding Party/Moving Party) 2023 ONCA 144 MacPherson, van Rensburg and Benotto JJ.A. DOCKET: M54052, M54053 & M54054 (COA-23-CV-0139) COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Tim Gilbert, Colin C......
2 cases
  • Leginj v Rahman,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 27, 2025
    ...21 The Court of Appeal has confirmed this test numerous times. See, for example, Haudenosaunee Development Institute v. Metrolinx, 2023 ONCA 144, at paras. 33 and 40: An interlocutory order is an order which “does not determine the real matter in dispute between the parties – the very subje......
  • Haudenosaunee Development Institute v Metrolinx,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • March 1, 2023
    ...Party (Appellant/Moving Party/Responding Party) and Metrolinx Respondent/Responding Party (Respondent/Responding Party/Moving Party) 2023 ONCA 144 MacPherson, van Rensburg and Benotto JJ.A. DOCKET: M54052, M54053 & M54054 (COA-23-CV-0139) COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Tim Gilbert, Colin C......