Haughian v. Jiwa et al., 2011 BCSC 1632

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgePunnett, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterPRACTICE,EVIDENCE,TORTS
Citation2011 BCSC 1632,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1632,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1632 (SC)
Date30 November 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Chateau Granville Partnership et al. v. Kindred Construction Ltd. et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 867
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 13, 2012
    ...this case is entirely suitable for summary trial. He argues (citing the discussion of the relevant legal principles in Houghian v. Jiwa , 2011 BCSC 1632, at paras. 42-45, and CIT Financial Ltd. v. Pavac Technology Inc. , 2008 BCSC 595, at paras. 30-32) that cases can be and are decided on t......
  • Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. v. Shanghai Boiler Works Co. et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 101
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 23, 2015
    ...Court should proceed to determine the matter. This rule applies even where conflicts exist in the affidavit evidence: Haughian v. Jiwa, 2011 BCSC 1632 at paras. 42-45; Paterson v. Langley Memorial Hospital, 2004 BCSC 1224 at para. 21. [54] Our Court of Appeal recently summarized the correct......
  • McKee v. McKee, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2100
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 5, 2012
    ...Court Family Rules [ Family Rules ]. The claimant cited two cases for me to consider, Jones v. Ma, 2010 BCSC 867 , and Haughian v. Jiwa, 2011 BCSC 1632, both of which deal with the Supreme Court Civil Rules , whose wording as to the requirements of expert reports is the same as those in the......
  • Albu v. University of British Columbia et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1624
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 26, 2014
    ...to have done this search or what materials she consulted or considered. [59] Defendants' counsel referred the court to Haughian v. Jiwa , 2011 BCSC 1632, at para. 33, where the court stated: ...The rule specifies the form a report is to take. It is imperative in its language. As noted, it i......
4 cases
  • McKee v. McKee, [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 2100
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 5, 2012
    ...Court Family Rules [ Family Rules ]. The claimant cited two cases for me to consider, Jones v. Ma, 2010 BCSC 867 , and Haughian v. Jiwa, 2011 BCSC 1632, both of which deal with the Supreme Court Civil Rules , whose wording as to the requirements of expert reports is the same as those in the......
  • Chateau Granville Partnership et al. v. Kindred Construction Ltd. et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 867
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 13, 2012
    ...this case is entirely suitable for summary trial. He argues (citing the discussion of the relevant legal principles in Houghian v. Jiwa , 2011 BCSC 1632, at paras. 42-45, and CIT Financial Ltd. v. Pavac Technology Inc. , 2008 BCSC 595, at paras. 30-32) that cases can be and are decided on t......
  • Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. v. Shanghai Boiler Works Co. et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 101
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 23, 2015
    ...Court should proceed to determine the matter. This rule applies even where conflicts exist in the affidavit evidence: Haughian v. Jiwa, 2011 BCSC 1632 at paras. 42-45; Paterson v. Langley Memorial Hospital, 2004 BCSC 1224 at para. 21. [54] Our Court of Appeal recently summarized the correct......
  • Albu v. University of British Columbia et al., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1624
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 26, 2014
    ...to have done this search or what materials she consulted or considered. [59] Defendants' counsel referred the court to Haughian v. Jiwa , 2011 BCSC 1632, at para. 33, where the court stated: ...The rule specifies the form a report is to take. It is imperative in its language. As noted, it i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT