Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Wittmann |
| Citation | 2017 ABQB 74 |
| Date | 03 February 2017 |
| Docket Number | 1601 05637 |
| Subject Matter | COURTS,STATUTES,POLICE,CRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
Reilly v Alberta
...of Travis Stang sworn on October 28, 2020, ¶ 8. Extracts of Key Evidence of the Appellant 6. 32 Alberta v. Edmonton Police Service, 2017 ABQB 74, ¶ 1 per Wittmann, C.J. (“There is a longstanding practice in Alberta for police officers to act as prosecutors at bail hearings before justices o......
-
Edmonton Police Service v Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner)
...not by private individuals and not by Crown prosecutors. Chief Justice Wittman made this observation in Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74 at para [95] Proceedings are initiated in the Code through the laying of charges under s. 504, where anyone who believes on reasonable and ......
-
R v Reilly, 2018 ABPC 85
...id="_ftn4">[4] Supra, Note 2: Irving Report, page 35 [5] Supra, Note 2: Irving Report, page 50 [6] Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74 [7] Staff Sergeant Fay testified that Code Red is the state of the detention unit at EPS is full and cannot accommodate anyone [8]n style="font-......
-
Reilly v Alberta, 2022 ABKB 612
...On February 3, 2017 (TASC, para 21), in Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74 (Bail Hearings Reference) the then Chief Justice of this Court confirmed that Alberta’s bail hearing regime was contrary to the Code and without legislative authority, with a six-month reprieve (t......
Get Started for Free
10 cases
-
Reilly v. Alberta
...of Travis Stang sworn on October 28, 2020, ¶ 8. Extracts of Key Evidence of the Appellant 6. [32] Alberta v. Edmonton Police Service, 2017 ABQB 74, ¶ 1 per Wittmann, C.J. (“There is a longstanding practice in Alberta for police officers to act as prosecutors at bail hearings before justices......
-
Phillips v. Edmonton (Police Service)
...not by private individuals and not by Crown prosecutors. Chief Justice Wittman made this observation in Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74 at para [95] Proceedings are initiated in the Code through the laying of charges under s. 504, where anyone who bel......
-
Edmonton Police Service v Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner)
...not by private individuals and not by Crown prosecutors. Chief Justice Wittman made this observation in Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74 at para [95] Proceedings are initiated in the Code through the laying of charges under s. 504, where anyone who believes on reasonable and ......
-
Romspen Mortgage Ltd Partnership v 3443 Zen Garden Ltd Partnership
...relief should not be granted [168] Declaratory judgments are discretionary. In Alberta (Attorney General) v Edmonton Police Service, 2017 ABQB 74 at para 15, Wittmann CJ set out the test for courts to use in determining whether declaratory relief is appropriate (relying on Daniels v Canada ......
Get Started for Free