Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74
Judge | Wittmann |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Citation | 2017 ABQB 74 |
Docket Number | 1601 05637 |
Date | 03 February 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
Reilly v Alberta,
...of Travis Stang sworn on October 28, 2020, ¶ 8. Extracts of Key Evidence of the Appellant 6. 32 Alberta v. Edmonton Police Service, 2017 ABQB 74, ¶ 1 per Wittmann, C.J. (“There is a longstanding practice in Alberta for police officers to act as prosecutors at bail hearings before justices o......
-
R v Reilly, 2018 ABPC 85
...id="_ftn4">[4] Supra, Note 2: Irving Report, page 35 [5] Supra, Note 2: Irving Report, page 50 [6] Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74 [7] Staff Sergeant Fay testified that Code Red is the state of the detention unit at EPS is full and cannot accommodate anyone [8]n style="font-......
-
Reilly v Alberta, 2022 ABKB 612
...On February 3, 2017 (TASC, para 21), in Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74 (Bail Hearings Reference) the then Chief Justice of this Court confirmed that Alberta’s bail hearing regime was contrary to the Code and without legislative authority, with a six-month reprieve (t......
-
R v Stout, 2018 ABPC 299
...follows is from the ASOF – Exhibit V1 [2] The Irving Report February 2016, Appendix C to Exhibit V-1 [3] Re Hearing Office Bail Hearings, 2017 ABQB 74 [4] Exhibit V1, Appendix E, the bail newsletter states, “At the Stakeholder workshop, the required contents of the bail package were [5] Cha......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
Reilly v Alberta,
...of Travis Stang sworn on October 28, 2020, ¶ 8. Extracts of Key Evidence of the Appellant 6. 32 Alberta v. Edmonton Police Service, 2017 ABQB 74, ¶ 1 per Wittmann, C.J. (“There is a longstanding practice in Alberta for police officers to act as prosecutors at bail hearings before justices o......
-
R v Reilly, 2018 ABPC 85
...id="_ftn4">[4] Supra, Note 2: Irving Report, page 35 [5] Supra, Note 2: Irving Report, page 50 [6] Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74 [7] Staff Sergeant Fay testified that Code Red is the state of the detention unit at EPS is full and cannot accommodate anyone [8]n style="font-......
-
Reilly v Alberta, 2022 ABKB 612
...On February 3, 2017 (TASC, para 21), in Hearing Office Bail Hearings (Re), 2017 ABQB 74 (Bail Hearings Reference) the then Chief Justice of this Court confirmed that Alberta’s bail hearing regime was contrary to the Code and without legislative authority, with a six-month reprieve (t......
-
R v Stout, 2018 ABPC 299
...follows is from the ASOF – Exhibit V1 [2] The Irving Report February 2016, Appendix C to Exhibit V-1 [3] Re Hearing Office Bail Hearings, 2017 ABQB 74 [4] Exhibit V1, Appendix E, the bail newsletter states, “At the Stakeholder workshop, the required contents of the bail package were [5] Cha......
Get Started for Free