Heckendorn v. Canada Revenue Agency et al., 2009 BCSC 952
| Judge | Meiklem, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | July 10, 2009 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2009 BCSC 952;[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 952 (SC);[2009] B.C.T.C. Uned. 952 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Holland v. American Dental Association et al., 2012 BCSC 1975
...bad faith as disclosing no cause of action. This remedy is also appropriate in the case at bar. Heckendorn v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2009 BCSC 952 at para. 47 BCPCA [13] The real issue in this application is: does the plaintiff have a potential case under the Business Practices and Consum......
-
Smith v. Central Okanagan (Regional District) et al., 2012 BCSC 1561
...she had no proper authority and knowing that his or her conduct would probably injure a party ( Heckendorn v. Canada (Revenue Agency) , 2009 BCSC 952). [22] In the pleadings before me there are no particular parties identified as the party who failed to investigate or who intentionally abus......
-
Rai v. Rai et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1891
...plaintiff] is deported back to India and he will never be able to return to Canada". [36] Citing Heckendorn v. Canada Revenue Agency , 2009 BCSC 952, counsel for the defendants submitted that there is a difference between a continuing cause of action and ongoing damage caused by a completed......
-
Tinaburri et al. v. North Vancouver (District), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 661 (SC)
...will not generally succeed on a Rule 18(6) application. [109] However, in Heckendorn v. Canada (Revenue Agency) , [2009] B.C.J. No. 1406, 2009 BCSC 952, 2009 D.T.C. 5154, [2009] 6 C.T.C. 171, 180 A.C.W.S. (3d) 664, Justice Meiklem dismissed claims of the plaintiff where he was satisfied tha......
4 cases
-
Holland v. American Dental Association et al., 2012 BCSC 1975
...bad faith as disclosing no cause of action. This remedy is also appropriate in the case at bar. Heckendorn v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2009 BCSC 952 at para. 47 BCPCA [13] The real issue in this application is: does the plaintiff have a potential case under the Business Practices and Consum......
-
Smith v. Central Okanagan (Regional District) et al., 2012 BCSC 1561
...she had no proper authority and knowing that his or her conduct would probably injure a party ( Heckendorn v. Canada (Revenue Agency) , 2009 BCSC 952). [22] In the pleadings before me there are no particular parties identified as the party who failed to investigate or who intentionally abus......
-
Rai v. Rai et al., [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1891
...plaintiff] is deported back to India and he will never be able to return to Canada". [36] Citing Heckendorn v. Canada Revenue Agency , 2009 BCSC 952, counsel for the defendants submitted that there is a difference between a continuing cause of action and ongoing damage caused by a completed......
-
Tinaburri et al. v. North Vancouver (District), [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 661 (SC)
...will not generally succeed on a Rule 18(6) application. [109] However, in Heckendorn v. Canada (Revenue Agency) , [2009] B.C.J. No. 1406, 2009 BCSC 952, 2009 D.T.C. 5154, [2009] 6 C.T.C. 171, 180 A.C.W.S. (3d) 664, Justice Meiklem dismissed claims of the plaintiff where he was satisfied tha......