Heffernan v Alberta, 2018 ABQB 13
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice John T. Henderson |
| Docket Number | 1703 03457 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 08 January 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Klippenstein v R, 2019 MBCA 13
...(at para 8) and rightly concluded that the applicant failed to do so (see R v DN, 2004 NLCA 44 at para 45; and Heffernan v Alberta, 2018 ABQB 13 at para 35). [9] The applicant’s allegation of bias against the application judge is without merit and requires no further comment. [10] For these......
-
R. v. Klippenstein, 2018 MBQB 121
...as to whether there has been an abuse of process, there is a threshold to be met. The Crown relies on the cases of Heffernan v. Alberta, 2018 ABQB 13, [2018] A.J. No. 13 (QL), and R. v. N. (D.), 2004 NLCA 44, 188 C.C.C. (3d) 89. Based on those cases, the Crown argued that Mr. Klippenstein m......
2 cases
-
Klippenstein v R, 2019 MBCA 13
...(at para 8) and rightly concluded that the applicant failed to do so (see R v DN, 2004 NLCA 44 at para 45; and Heffernan v Alberta, 2018 ABQB 13 at para 35). [9] The applicant’s allegation of bias against the application judge is without merit and requires no further comment. [10] For these......
-
R. v. Klippenstein, 2018 MBQB 121
...as to whether there has been an abuse of process, there is a threshold to be met. The Crown relies on the cases of Heffernan v. Alberta, 2018 ABQB 13, [2018] A.J. No. 13 (QL), and R. v. N. (D.), 2004 NLCA 44, 188 C.C.C. (3d) 89. Based on those cases, the Crown argued that Mr. Klippenstein m......